Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SUM4620446112525)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Summit Hotels & Resorts's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Summit Hotels & Resorts Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Summit Hotels & Resorts breach identified under incident ID SUM4620446112525.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Summit Hotels & Resorts's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/summit-hotelsandresorts, the number of followers: 11320, the industry type: Hospitality and the number of employees: 382 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 775 and after the incident was 696 with a difference of -79 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Summit Hotels & Resorts and their customers.
On 21 November 2025, Summit Hotel Properties disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Summit Hotel Properties Data Breach".
Summit Hotel Properties, a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT), experienced a data breach where an external threat actor accessed corporate servers and exfiltrated documents containing personally identifiable information (PII).
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Corporate servers, and exposing Name, Date of Birth and Address.
In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Immediate steps taken to contain the incident within 24 hours, while recovery efforts such as 24 months of complimentary Kroll identity theft protection for affected individuals continue, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure to New Hampshire Attorney General’s office and Customer notifications (ongoing).
The case underscores how Ongoing (full scope of breach not yet determined as of Nov. 21, 2025), and recommending next steps like Sign up for complimentary 24 months of Kroll identity theft protection, Monitor financial statements for suspicious activity and Place a fraud alert on credit reports, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Data breach notifications sent to affected individuals, Offer of 24 months of Kroll identity theft protection and Guidance on monitoring accounts and placing fraud alerts.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating infiltrated corporate servers (no specific vector, but public-facing servers likely targeted) and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating corporate servers accessed (possible misuse of legitimate credentials or compromised accounts). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltrated sensitive PII such as names, DOB, addresses, SSNs, emails, phone numbers from corporate servers and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating corporate servers accessed (likely network shares containing PII documents). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (T1048.003) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltrated sensitive PII (likely staged to cloud/actor-controlled infrastructure) and Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (75%), supported by evidence indicating worldleaks threatened to publish data on the dark web (implies C2-controlled exfiltration). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Cloud Service Dashboards: Leak Data on Dark Web (T1538.003) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating worldleaks threatened to publish the stolen data on the dark web and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating breach contained within 24 hours (no evidence of destruction, but possible if data was deleted post-exfiltration). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal: File Deletion (T1070.004) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating contained within 24 hours (actor may have deleted logs/tools to evade detection). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating corporate servers accessed (possible credential theft to move laterally, though not explicitly confirmed). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Summit Hotels & Resorts Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/summit-hotelsandresorts/incident/SUM4620446112525
- Summit Hotels & Resorts CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/summit-hotelsandresorts
- Summit Hotels & Resorts Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/sum4620446112525-summit-hotel-properties-breach-may-2025/
- Summit Hotels & Resorts CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/summit-hotelsandresorts/history
- Summit Hotels & Resorts CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/investigations/summit-hotel-properties-data-breach-2025
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf