Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Stryker » STRFBI1774644063

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (STRFBI1774644063)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-12
Company Score Before Incident773 / 1000
Company Score After Incident761 / 1000
Company LinkView Stryker Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERSTRFBI1774644063
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal photographs, resume, and other...
INCIDENT DATE04/12/2024
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Stryker's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Stryker Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Stryker breach identified under incident ID STRFBI1774644063.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Stryker's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/stryker, the number of followers: 1694532, the industry type: Medical Equipment Manufacturing and the number of employees: 50225 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 773 and after the incident was 761 with a difference of -12 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Stryker and their customers.

On 11 October 2024, Kash Patel (FBI Director) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Pro-Iranian Hackers Claim Breach of FBI Director’s Personal Account".

A pro-Iranian hacking group, Handala, announced it had compromised an account belonging to FBI Director Kash Patel, releasing decades-old personal photographs, a resume, and other documents online.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal photographs, resume, and other personal documents.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Steps taken to mitigate risks from the breach, and stakeholders are being briefed through FBI issued a public statement.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Compromise Accounts (T1586) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating compromised an account belonging to FBI Director Kash Patel and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating fBI confirmed awareness of the incident involving Patels account. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Gather Victim Identity Information: Email Addresses (T1589.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating targeting efforts against Patel prior to the breach and Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no details on how the account was initially compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating decades-old personal photographs, resume, and other documents. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating releasing...personal photographs, resume, and other documents online. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data destruction, but documents were leaked and Defacement (T1491) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating group posted a statement taunting Patel alongside materials. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating historical data was exposed, suggesting possible long-term access. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Compromise Accounts (90%)
Valid Accounts (80%)
Credential Access
Gather Victim Identity Information: Email Addresses (70%)
Brute Force (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Defacement (70%)
Defense Evasion
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (50%)

Sources & References