Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » STRATESYS » STR47103347112625

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (STR47103347112625)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-82
Company Score Before Incident761 / 1000
Company Score After Incident679 / 1000
Company LinkView STRATESYS Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERSTR47103347112625
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal data (unspecified)
INCIDENT DATE25/11/2025
STATUSConcluded (fine imposed)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of STRATESYS's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts STRATESYS Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the STRATESYS breach identified under incident ID STR47103347112625.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of STRATESYS's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/stratesys, the number of followers: 102039, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 1696 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 761 and after the incident was 679 with a difference of -82 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on STRATESYS and their customers.

On 26 November 2025, Stratesys Technology Solutions disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Stratesys Technology Solutions GDPR Data Breach and Fine".

Stratesys Technology Solutions, a tech consultancy company, suffered a data breach that resulted in the failure to protect personal data, leading to a €60,000 fine under the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal data (unspecified), plus an estimated financial loss of €60,000 (fine after reduction from €100,000).

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure via Spanish Data Protection Agency statement.

The case underscores how Concluded (fine imposed).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating failure to adequately protect personal data, GDPR violation implies potential web/app exposure. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized exposure of personal data (PII) with no ransomware/encryption noted. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Cloud Logs (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating lapse in data security measures suggests possible logging/monitoring failures. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no explicit destruction, but exposure implies loss of confidentiality (GDPR focus) and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (10%), supported by evidence indicating no ransomware noted, but included due to GDPR fine context (low confidence). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References