Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

STEYR TraktorenSTEYR Traktoren
VS
UPLUPL
STEYR Traktoren

STEYR Traktoren

Steyrer Straße 32 , St. Valentin, A-4300, AT

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.steyr-traktoren.com
757/1000Fair

STEYR has been synonymous with leading technology and high-quality machinery for more than 70 years. Its premium Austrian-built tractor range focuses on outstanding comfort and precision operation, using proven technical innovations to maximise productivity for operato...

NAICS:111
NAICS Definition:Crop Production
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UPL

UPL

UPL House, Mumbai, 400051, IN

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.upl-ltd.com
773/1000Fair

UPL Ltd. (NSE: UPL & BSE: 512070) is a global provider of sustainable agriculture products & solutions, with annual revenue exceeding $5 billion. As one of the top 5 agriculture solutions companies worldwide, our robust portfolio consists of biologicals and traditional ...

NAICS:111
NAICS Definition:Crop Production
Employees:13,566
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
STEYR Traktoren

STEYR Traktoren

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UPL

UPL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Farming Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for STEYR Traktoren in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Farming Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UPL in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - STEYR Traktoren (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STEYR Traktoren cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UPL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UPL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
STEYR Traktoren

STEYR Traktoren

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UPL

UPL

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between STEYR Traktoren company and UPL company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between STEYR Traktoren company and UPL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between STEYR Traktoren company and UPL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between STEYR Traktoren company and UPL company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between STEYR Traktoren company and UPL company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between STEYR Traktoren company and UPL company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between STEYR Traktoren company and UPL company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between STEYR Traktoren company and UPL company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between STEYR Traktoren company and UPL company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between STEYR Traktoren company and UPL company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between STEYR Traktoren company and UPL company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between STEYR Traktoren and UPL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between STEYR Traktoren and UPL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - STEYR Traktoren or UPL ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - STEYR Traktoren or UPL ?
Between STEYR Traktoren and UPL, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between STEYR Traktoren and UPL, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103342
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103065
SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105122
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105121
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
REFERENCES