Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Sterling Seacrest Pritchard » STE1774874213

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (STE1774874213)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-86
Company Score Before Incident683 / 1000
Company Score After Incident597 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERSTE1774874213
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal information of 7,420 individuals
INCIDENT DATE29/03/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Sterling Seacrest Pritchard's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Sterling Seacrest Pritchard Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Sterling Seacrest Pritchard breach identified under incident ID STE1774874213.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Sterling Seacrest Pritchard's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sterling-seacrest-pritchard, the number of followers: 6880, the industry type: Insurance and the number of employees: 419 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 683 and after the incident was 597 with a difference of -86 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Sterling Seacrest Pritchard and their customers.

Sterling Seacrest Pritchard recently reported "Sterling Seacrest Pritchard Email Data Breach", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Sterling Seacrest Pritchard, a prominent insurance brokerage and risk management firm, disclosed a data breach involving its email system, exposing the personal information of 7,420 individuals.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Email system, and exposing Personal information of 7,420 individuals, with nearly 7,420 records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data breach involving its email system and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attack vector or vulnerability exploited remains undisclosed. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating email system breach; no details on attack vector and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating personal information...potentially financial or insurance-related records. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Email Collection (T1114) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data breach involving its email system and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating names, contact details, financial or insurance-related records exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating personal information of 7,420 individuals exposed and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no details on data exfiltration method. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on malware or data destruction and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive client data remains a high-value target. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (80%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (60%)
Credentials from Password Stores (50%)
Collection
Email Collection (90%)
Data from Local System (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References