What is the official website of Stavanger Aftenblad ?

The official website of Stavanger Aftenblad is http://www.aftenbladet.no.

What is Stavanger Aftenblad's cybersecurity risk score?

Stavanger Aftenblad has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of null out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Stavanger Aftenblad experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Stavanger Aftenblad currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Stavanger Aftenblad been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Stavanger Aftenblad has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Stavanger Aftenblad have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Stavanger Aftenblad is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Stavanger Aftenblad have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Stavanger Aftenblad does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Stavanger Aftenblad comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Stavanger Aftenblad is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Stavanger Aftenblad have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Stavanger Aftenblad does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Stavanger Aftenblad comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Stavanger Aftenblad is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Stavanger Aftenblad have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Stavanger Aftenblad is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Stavanger Aftenblad operate in ?

Stavanger Aftenblad operates primarily in the Newspaper Publishing industry.

How many employees does Stavanger Aftenblad have ?

Stavanger Aftenblad employs approximately 51-200 employees people worldwide.

Does Stavanger Aftenblad own any subsidiaries ?

Stavanger Aftenblad presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Stavanger Aftenblad have ?

Stavanger Aftenblad's official LinkedIn profile has approximately followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Stavanger Aftenblad ?

Stavanger Aftenblad is classified under the NAICS code 51111, which corresponds to Newspaper Publishers.

Does Stavanger Aftenblad have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Stavanger Aftenblad does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Stavanger Aftenblad have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Stavanger Aftenblad maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/stavanger-aftenblad.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Stavanger Aftenblad experienced ?

As of July 2, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Stavanger Aftenblad has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Stavanger Aftenblad have ?

Stavanger Aftenblad has an estimated 2,100 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

Stavanger Aftenblad

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

/1000

Fair

/1000

Critical

Stavanger Aftenblad Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

aftenbladet.no

Add Your Compliance Badge

Stavanger Aftenblad er Rogalands ledende mediehus, og leverer nyheter i papiravisen Stavanger Aftenblad, nett/brett- og mobilavisen Aftenbladet.no og på webtv som TV Aftenbladet. Du kan også lese Aftenbladet som e-avis. Mediehuset er en del av Schibsted-konsernet sammen med Aftenposten, Bergens Tidende, Fædrelandsvennen, VG og Finn i Norge.

Stavanger Aftenblad A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

Stavanger Aftenblad

Stavanger Aftenblad CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

Stavanger Aftenblad Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for Stavanger Aftenblad

Incidents vs Newspaper Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stavanger Aftenblad in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stavanger Aftenblad in 2026.

Incident Types Stavanger Aftenblad vs Newspaper Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stavanger Aftenblad in 2026.

Incident History - Stavanger Aftenblad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Stavanger Aftenblad Subsidiaries

Stavanger Aftenblad

Newspaper Publishing

Website: http://www.aftenbladet.no

Company Size: 51-200 employees

SchibstedInternet Marketplace Platforms

FINN.no – mulighetenes markedTechnology, Information and Internet

FINN jobb – for bedrifterInternet Publishing

FINN motor – for bedrifterInternet Marketplace Platforms

AftonbladetNewspaper Publishing

BlocketInternet Marketplace Platforms

Schibsted Tech PolskaSoftware Development

Svenska DagbladetNewspaper Publishing

AftenpostenNewspaper Publishing

Schibsted FinlandInternet Marketplace Platforms

A Perfect Guide ABAdvertising Services

Mittanbud MarketplacesTechnology, Information and Internet

Bergens TidendeNewspaper Publishing

VG - Verdens Gang ASMedia Production

Kundkraft Sverige ABUtilities

Let's dealAdvertising Services

PrisjaktTechnology, Information and Internet

E24.noNewspaper Publishing

Loading…

Stavanger Aftenblad Similar Companies

The Wall Street Journal

cb wsj.com

Winner of 40 Pulitzer Prizes for outstanding journalism, The Wall Street Journal includes coverage of U.S. and world news, politics, arts, culture, lifestyle, sports, health and more. It's a critical resource of curated content in print, online and mobile apps, complete with breaking news streams, interactive features, video, online columns and blogs. Since 1889, readers have trusted the Journal for accurate, objective information to fuel their decisions as well as enlighten, educate and inspire them. On LinkedIn, we will share articles to help you navigate your career, including stories from our business, management, leisure and technology sections. Subscribe: http://on.wsj.com/1n1uvCH Job opportunities: http://www.dowjones.com/careers

Nikkei

nikkei.co.jp

Nikkei is a world-renowned media brand for Asian news, respected for quality journalism and for being a trusted provider of business news and information. Founded as a market news provider in Japan in 1876, Nikkei has grown into one of the world’s largest media corporations, with 37 foreign editorial bureaus and approximately 1,500 journalists worldwide. Nikkei acquired the Financial Times in 2015. Combined digital and print readership of the Nikkei and the FT totals about 4 million.

Loading…

NEWS

Stavanger Aftenblad CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-55790

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). In versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.22 and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.15, an attacker with only a GitHub account can plant a JavaScript payload in a craftcms/cms issue title. When a Craft admin uses the CraftSupport widget’s "Give feedback" screen and types a search term that returns the poisoned issue, the payload executes in the admin’s control panel session. No control panel account or elevated privileges are required on the attacker’s side. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.16 and 5.9.23.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-50284

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). In versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.21 and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.14, theAssetsController::actionDeleteFolder() only requires the deleteAssets:<volume-uid> permission for the target folder. It never enforces deletePeerAssets:<volume-uid>, even though Assets::deleteFoldersByIds() cascades deletion to every descendant folder and every asset inside, regardless of the uploader's assigned privileges. A low-privilege user who has been granted folder-management rights on a shared volume can therefore destroy assets uploaded by other users (peer assets), bypassing the per-asset peer-permission check that the sibling actionDeleteAsset endpoint correctly applies. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.15 and 5.9.22.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-50283

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). Versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.20, and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.13 contain an authorization issue in the AssetsController::actionReplaceFile that can delete a source asset without source delete permission by supplying both assetId and sourceAssetId. AssetsController::actionReplaceFile() supports replacing a target asset file using another existing asset as the source. The action loads: assetId -> $assetToReplace and sourceAssetId -> $sourceAsset, then enforces replace permissions using ($assetToReplace ?: $sourceAsset). When both IDs are provided, this expression resolves to the target asset so no permission check is performed against the source asset volume. When both assets are present, Craft copies the source file into the target and then deletes the source asset. There is no deletion check for for the source asset. An authenticated user who can replace files in one volume can delete assets in another volume where they do not have delete permission, as long as they can obtain a sourceAssetId, leading to broken content references and data loss. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.14 and 5.9.21.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-14440

SUMMARY

Description: To issue and renew TLS certificates on behalf of customers, Cloudflare's Universal SSL feature automatically manages the CAA RRset for the customer's zone. This auto-managed RRset is permissive by design (e.g. 'issue "letsencrypt.org"' without parameters). On Universal SSL zones, Cloudflare's authoritative DNS serves this auto-managed RRset at query time, superseding any customer-configured CAA records on the zone. When a customer publishes a stricter CAA record using the RFC 8657 accounturi or validationmethods parameters, the Certificate Authority does not observe those parameters when evaluating the served RRset under RFC 8659. As a result, the RFC 8657 account-binding and validation-method-binding protections are not enforced end-to-end on Universal SSL zones. Successful exploitation could result in issuance of a browser-trusted TLS certificate to an attacker, enabling MITM against the affected domain. Exploitation is non-trivial in practice: an attacker would need to hold an ACME account at one of the Certificate Authorities in the served CAA RRset and to simultaneously satisfy domain control validation across the multiple geographically distinct Network Perspectives the CA relies on for Multi-Perspective Issuance Corroboration. Cloudflare prefixes are anycast-announced from hundreds of locations globally, raising the bar against single-vantage-point BGP hijacks. Any resulting misissuance of a browser-trusted certificate is subject to Certificate Transparency logging required by major browsers, and would be visible to CT monitoring. Mitigation: Customers requiring strict RFC 8657 enforcement need to disable Universal SSL on the affected zone. Universal SSL's automatic CAA management and customer-set RFC 8657 accounturi and validationmethods enforcement are mutually exclusive by the nature of the issue, so there is no in-product workaround that preserves both. Certificate Transparency monitoring is recommended for all customers as a general detection control. Credits: David Osipov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2713-9242), independent researcher

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.6

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-14422

SUMMARY

Out of bounds read and write in Tint in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform out of bounds memory access via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…