Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Starbucks » STA1773390498

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (STA1773390498)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-32
Company Score Before Incident713 / 1000
Company Score After Incident681 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERSTA1773390498
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORFraudulent websites impersonating Partner Central
DATA EXPOSEDNames, Social Security numbers, dates...
INCIDENT DATE05/02/2026
STATUSCompleted (initial investigation)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Starbucks's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Starbucks Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Starbucks breach identified under incident ID STA1773390498.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Starbucks's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/starbucks, the number of followers: 3116587, the industry type: Retail and the number of employees: 185106 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 713 and after the incident was 681 with a difference of -32 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Starbucks and their customers.

On 06 February 2026, Starbucks disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Starbucks Data Breach Impacting Hundreds of Employees".

Starbucks confirmed a data breach affecting 889 employees after threat actors gained unauthorized access to their Starbucks Partner Central accounts, which store sensitive employment and personal information.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Starbucks Partner Central, and exposing Names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, financial account details (routing numbers), with nearly 889 records at risk.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Revoked access to compromised accounts (took 5 days after detection), and began remediation that includes Enhanced security controls for Partner Central accounts, and stakeholders are being briefed through Advisories to affected employees to monitor bank accounts.

The case underscores how Completed (initial investigation), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Advised affected employees to monitor bank accounts for suspicious activity.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating attackers obtained login credentials through fraudulent websites impersonating Partner Central and Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating gained unauthorized access to their Starbucks Partner Central accounts. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating fraudulent websites impersonating Partner Central and Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating compromised login credentials via fraudulent websites. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating breach exposed names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, financial account details. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting 889 employees. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating gained unauthorized access to their Starbucks Partner Central accounts and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attackers compromised accounts between January 19 and February 11. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Compromise Accounts (T1586) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating high identity theft risk and payment information risk. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (90%)
Valid Accounts (90%)
Credential Access
Credentials from Password Stores (70%)
Brute Force: Password Guessing (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (80%)
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (50%)
Impact
Compromise Accounts (80%)

Sources & References