Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (STASHIADT1779870423)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Standard Chartered Global Private Bank's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Standard Chartered Global Private Bank Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Standard Chartered Global Private Bank breach identified under incident ID STASHIADT1779870423.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Standard Chartered Global Private Bank's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/standard-chartered-private-bank, the number of followers: 3925, the industry type: Financial Services and the number of employees: None employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 756 and after the incident was 616 with a difference of -140 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Standard Chartered Global Private Bank and their customers.
On 01 April 2024, Charter Communications (Spectrum) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Charter Communications Data Breach".
Charter Communications, parent company of Spectrum, experienced a data breach linked to the hacking group ShinyHunters.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Customer names, email addresses, phone numbers, plan details, support ticket information, and some CPNI data (disputed), with nearly 40 million (disputed) records at risk.
In response, teams activated the incident response plan, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public statement to Tom’s Guide.
The case underscores how Ongoing.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Voice Phishing (T1566.004) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating breached Charter on April 1 via a voice phishing attack. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating compromised an employee account via voice phishing. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 40 million records containing customer names, emails, phone numbers and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating support ticket information was also allegedly taken. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating shinyHunters claimed to have stolen 40 million records. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating discrepancy between company’s statement and hackers’ claims and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating charter maintains no sensitive data compromised, disputed by hackers. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Standard Chartered Global Private Bank Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/standard-chartered-private-bank/incident/STASHIADT1779870423
- Standard Chartered Global Private Bank CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/standard-chartered-private-bank
- Standard Chartered Global Private Bank Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/stashiadt1779870423-adt-charter-communications-aura-breach-april-2026/
- Standard Chartered Global Private Bank CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/standard-chartered-private-bank/history
- Standard Chartered Global Private Bank CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.tomsguide.com/computing/online-security/hackers-allegedly-stole-40-million-records-from-charter-communications-everything-you-need-to-know
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf