Comparison Overview

Stadler

VS

Gemco Rail

Stadler

Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

International rail vehicle construction company, Stadler, is headquartered in Bussnang in Eastern Switzerland. Founded in 1942, it has a workforce of around 11,000 based in various production and over 40 service locations. Stadler provides a comprehensive range of products in the heavy and urban transport segments: High-speed trains, intercity trains, regional and commuter heavy rail trains, underground trains, tram trains and trams. Stadler also manufactures main-line locomotives, shunting locomotives and passenger carriages, including the most powerful diesel-electric locomotive in Europe. It is the world’s leading manufacturer in the rack-and-pinion rail vehicle industry.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 5,244
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Gemco Rail

Level 1, 198 Turner Street, Port Melbourne, VIC, 3207, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

As part of ASX listed Engenco Limited, Gemco Rail Pty Ltd has been a well-known supplier of quality products and service to the rail sector for many years. Building on this solid reputation and experience, the business specialises in providing fleet management services to national rail operators and in the manufacture, refurbishment, and overhaul of rail equipment. Gemco Rail provides wagon and locomotive schedule and ad-hoc maintenance services and manufactures custom designed and engineered new and refurbished wagons, bogie component parts, and associated rail equipment. Gemco Rail also supplies a broad range of rail track maintenance equipment and parts.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stadler-rail.jpeg
Stadler
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemco-rail.jpeg
Gemco Rail
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stadler
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gemco Rail
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stadler in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gemco Rail in 2025.

Incident History — Stadler (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stadler cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gemco Rail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gemco Rail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stadler-rail.jpeg
Stadler
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Malware
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Data Exfiltration, Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemco-rail.jpeg
Gemco Rail
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gemco Rail company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stadler company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Stadler company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Gemco Rail company has not reported any.

In the current year, Gemco Rail company and Stadler company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gemco Rail company nor Stadler company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gemco Rail company nor Stadler company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gemco Rail company nor Stadler company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stadler company nor Gemco Rail company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stadler nor Gemco Rail holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Stadler company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Gemco Rail company.

Stadler company employs more people globally than Gemco Rail company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Stadler nor Gemco Rail holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stadler nor Gemco Rail holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stadler nor Gemco Rail holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stadler nor Gemco Rail holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stadler nor Gemco Rail holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stadler nor Gemco Rail holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H