Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SPR1776191398)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Springfield Hospital, Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Springfield Hospital, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Springfield Hospital, Inc. breach identified under incident ID SPR1776191398.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Springfield Hospital, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/springfield-hospital-vt, the number of followers: 484, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 208 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 764 and after the incident was 701 with a difference of -63 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Springfield Hospital, Inc. and their customers.
On 10 February 2026, Springfield Hospital disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Springfield Hospital Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Patient Information".
Springfield Hospital, a not-for-profit critical access hospital in Springfield, Vermont, is under investigation following a data breach that compromised sensitive patient information.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Employee email system, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI).
In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Secured email system.
The case underscores how Ongoing.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to an employee email account and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating compromised account contained PII and PHI. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to an employee email account and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating employee email account contained sensitive data. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Email Collection: Remote Email Collection (T1114.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating compromised account contained PII and PHI and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating full names, DOB, SSNs, medical record numbers exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive patient information compromised and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to employee email account. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating potential reputational damage due to data breach and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating high identity theft risk for affected patients. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Springfield Hospital, Inc. Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/springfield-hospital-vt/incident/SPR1776191398
- Springfield Hospital, Inc. CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/springfield-hospital-vt
- Springfield Hospital, Inc. Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/spr1776191398-springfield-hospital-breach-december-2025/
- Springfield Hospital, Inc. CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/springfield-hospital-vt/history
- Springfield Hospital, Inc. CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/investigations/springfield-hospital-data-breach-2026
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf