Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Spotify » ISRSPOWHA1778675186

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ISRSPOWHA1778675186)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-12
Company Score Before Incident748 / 1000
Company Score After Incident736 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERISRSPOWHA1778675186
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNetwork Flooding, Spoofed/Hijacked Messaging Accounts, Public Data Leak
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal information of 48 individuals...
INCIDENT DATE10/05/2026
STATUSOngoing (National Cyber Directorate)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Spotify's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Spotify Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Spotify breach identified under incident ID ISRSPOWHA1778675186.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Spotify's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/spotify, the number of followers: 4438760, the industry type: Musicians and the number of employees: 18042 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 748 and after the incident was 736 with a difference of -12 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Spotify and their customers.

On 18 October 2023, Spotify disclosed DDoS, Psychological Warfare and Data Exposure issues under the banner "Pro-Iran Hacker Groups Launch Coordinated Cyberattacks Targeting Spotify and Israeli Citizens".

A pro-Iran hacker collective, the Islamic Cyber Resistance in Iraq – 313 Team, claimed responsibility for a DDoS attack that disrupted Spotify’s services, causing widespread access issues.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Spotify app, Spotify support site and Spotify web player, and exposing Personal information of 48 individuals (IDF veterans/reservists), with nearly 48 records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Spotify acknowledged the incident on X (formerly Twitter).

The case underscores how Ongoing (National Cyber Directorate), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Spotify acknowledged service disruptions on X (formerly Twitter).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including dDoS attack that disrupted Spotify’s services, and completely disabled the platform’s main servers. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including dDoS attack...causing widespread access issues for users, and spotify app, support site, and web player...slowdowns or failures and Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating threatening WhatsApp messages...sent from hijacked or spoofed business accounts. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Compromise Accounts (T1586) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating whatsApp messages...sent from hijacked or spoofed business accounts. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating target list allegedly exposing 60 senior officers...included only 48 individuals. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating published a target list...exposing personal information of 48 individuals. Under the Influence tactic, the analysis identified Gather Victim Identity Information (T1591) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating target list...exposing 60 senior officers...48 individuals (IDF veterans/reservists), Search Victim-Owned Websites (T1594) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating most of whom were veterans and reservists...identifying their past service on social media, and Impersonation (T1656) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating whatsApp messages...sent from hijacked or spoofed business accounts. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Endpoint Denial of Service (90%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (90%)
Defacement (50%)
Credential Access
Compromise Accounts (80%)
Collection
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Influence
Gather Victim Identity Information (80%)
Search Victim-Owned Websites (70%)
Impersonation (90%)

Sources & References