Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SPOLIM1769425652)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of SportAdmin's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts SportAdmin Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the SportAdmin breach identified under incident ID SPOLIM1769425652.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of SportAdmin's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sportadmin, the number of followers: 2021, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 64 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 750 and after the incident was 556 with a difference of -194 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on SportAdmin and their customers.
Lime Technologies AB recently reported "Lime Technologies’ Sportadmin Data Breach and GDPR Violation", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
Sweden-based IT company Lime Technologies AB, provider of CRM and SaaS solutions including Sportadmin, was fined 6 million kronor (approx.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Sportadmin (club management service), and exposing Personal identity numbers, club affiliations, sensitive protected information, with nearly 2100000 records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of 6000000 SEK (approx. €530,000).
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how Completed (regulatory action taken), teams are taking away lessons such as Systemic failures in security measures highlight the need for sufficient technical and organizational safeguards under GDPR, and recommending next steps like Implement robust IT security measures, enhance monitoring, and ensure compliance with GDPR Article 32.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including inadequate IT security measures, and systemic failures in the company’s security measures. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including inadequate IT security measures, and personal identity numbers...exposed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personal identity numbers, club affiliations, sensitive protected information. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach exposed personal information of over 2.1 million individuals and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cloud-based CRM systems such as Lime Go and Lime CRM. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating systemic failures in the company’s security measures. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- SportAdmin Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/sportadmin/incident/SPOLIM1769425652
- SportAdmin CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/sportadmin
- SportAdmin Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/spolim1769425652-sportadmin-lime-technologies-ab-breach-january-2025/
- SportAdmin CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/sportadmin/history
- SportAdmin CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.marketscreener.com/news/lime-owned-sportadmin-fined-6-million-kronor-following-data-breach-ce7e5bdbdb8bfe20
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf