Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kreissparkasse Traunstein-TrostbergKreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg
VS
ChaseChase
Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg

Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg

N/A

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.spk-ts.de
755/1000Fair

Unsere Sparkasse wurde im Jahre 1863 gegründet und ist das größte selbstständige Kredit­institut im Land­kreis. Unser Geschäfts­gebiet ist, mit Ausnahme der Gemeinde Schnaitsee, der gesamte Landkreis Traunstein mit rund 170.000 Einwohnern und einer Fläche von 1.534 qkm....

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:86
Subsidiaries:63
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Chase

Chase

270 Park Avenue, New York, 10172, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.chase.com
790/1000Fair

At Chase, we’re dedicated to helping you succeed. Whether you’re in need of banking, credit cards, mortgages, auto financing, investment guidance, small business support, or payment solutions, we’re beside you every step of the way. For customer service, contact us via...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:34,537
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg

Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Chase

Chase

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chase in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Chase (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chase cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg

Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Chase

Chase

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHA10418622

FAQ

Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Chase company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Chase company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Chase company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Chase company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Chase company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Chase company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Chase company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Chase company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Chase company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Chase company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Chase company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg and Chase, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg and Chase, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg or Chase ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg or Chase ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg and Chase, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg and Chase, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA