Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Sound Radix » SOU1774491907

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SOU1774491907)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-95
Company Score Before Incident750 / 1000
Company Score After Incident655 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERSOU1774491907
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED293,000 unique email addresses, names,...
INCIDENT DATE22/03/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Sound Radix's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Sound Radix Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Sound Radix breach identified under incident ID SOU1774491907.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Sound Radix's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/soundradix, the number of followers: 2951, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 11 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 750 and after the incident was 655 with a difference of -95 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Sound Radix and their customers.

Sound Radix recently reported "Sound Radix Data Breach Exposes 293K Email Addresses", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A recent data breach at Sound Radix exposed 293,000 unique email addresses, along with names and potentially hashed passwords.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 293,000 unique email addresses, names, and potentially hashed passwords, with nearly 293,000 records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Self-reported to Have I Been Pwned (HIBP).

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Breaches rarely occur in isolation; exposed data accumulates over time, increasing the effectiveness of credential stuffing, phishing, and identity-based attacks. Organizations must monitor credential exposure across multiple incidents, and recommending next steps like Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA), Enforce strong password hygiene and Proactively monitor identity protection.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating data breach at Sound Radix exposed 293,000 unique email addresses and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 76% of compromised emails appeared in previous breaches (e.g., LinkedIn). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Credential Stuffing (T1110.004) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 76% of compromised emails had already appeared in previous breaches and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating potentially hashed passwords were exposed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 293,000 unique email addresses, names, and hashed passwords exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach exposed 293,000 records (email addresses, names, passwords). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Compromise Accounts (T1586) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating high risk of credential stuffing and phishing due to aggregated data. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (40%)
Valid Accounts (70%)
Credential Access
Credential Stuffing (90%)
Credentials from Password Stores (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Compromise Accounts (80%)

Sources & References