Comparison Overview
Sony Interactive Entertainment

Sony Interactive Entertainment
2207 Bridgepointe Pkwy, San Mateo, California, US, 94404
Last Update: 30/03/2026
Sony Interactive Entertainment, the company behind PlayStation, pushes the boundaries of entertainment and innovation, starting from the launch of the original PlayStation in Japan in 1994. Today, we continue to deliver innovative and thrilling experiences to a global a...

Dave & Buster's Inc.
1221 S Belt Line Rd, Coppell, Texas, 75019, US
Last Update: 31/03/2026
Welcome to Dave & Buster's, the ONLY place to Eat, Drink, Play & Watch Sports®, all under one roof! Here, you can immerse yourself in a world of excitement, from our Million Dollar Midway, packed with the hottest arcade games, to our mouth-watering, chef-crafted creatio...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sony Interactive Entertainment







Dave & Buster's Inc.






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)
Sony Interactive Entertainment has 50.98% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Dave & Buster's Inc. in 2026.
Incident History - Sony Interactive Entertainment (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sony Interactive Entertainment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Dave & Buster's Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Dave & Buster's Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sony Interactive Entertainment

Dave & Buster's Inc.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.