Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » SonicWall » SON1776925440

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SON1776925440)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact0
Company Score Before Incident100 / 1000
Company Score After Incident100 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERSON1776925440
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORremote access services, VPN compromises, email
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2024
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of SonicWall's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts SonicWall Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the SonicWall breach identified under incident ID SON1776925440.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of SonicWall's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sonicwall, the number of followers: 114071, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 1979 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 100 and after the incident was 100 with a difference of 0 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on SonicWall and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Ransomware and Financial Fraud Surge in 2025, Driven by Remote Access Vulnerabilities", has drawn attention.

The 2026 InsurSec Report from At-Bay reveals a sharp rise in cyber incidents in 2025, with ransomware and financial fraud leading the surge.

The disruption is felt across the environment, plus an estimated financial loss of $221,000 (average severity), $508,000 (ransomware severity), $285,000 (financial fraud), $9.65 million (largest single loss).

In response, while recovery efforts such as funds were returned in 70% of cases reported within three days continue.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Improved email security shifted attacker focus away from phishing. Organizations with 24/7 MDR monitoring avoided encryption in every Akira case. Rapid reporting improved recovery outcomes for financial fraud, and recommending next steps like Enhance remote access security, implement 24/7 MDR monitoring, improve reporting speed for financial fraud, and address third-party tracking tool vulnerabilities.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified External Remote Services (T1133) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating remote access services were the primary entry point for 87% of ransomware claims and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including vPN compromises accounted for 73% of intrusions, and sonicWall devices involved in one-third of ransomware claims. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating akira ransomware executed attacks within hours or minutes of initial access. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating vPN compromises as primary entry point for ransomware. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating remote access vulnerabilities and VPN weaknesses exploited. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating two-thirds of attacks occurred outside business hours, exploiting gaps in coverage and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating vPN compromises as primary attack vector. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating vPN compromises as primary entry point for ransomware and Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating vPN compromises accounted for 73% of intrusions. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating remote access services as primary entry point for ransomware. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including akira ransomware group executed data encryption, and ransomware severity reached $508,000 and Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attacks with encryption. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating akira ransomware group activity spike, financial fraud losses escalated. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating attackers routed malicious links through trusted cloud platforms like Cloudflare. Under the Financial Theft tactic, the analysis identified Financial Theft (T1657) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including financial fraud remained the most common incident type (30% of claims), and average stolen funds rose 16% to $285,000. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
External Remote Services (95%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Persistence
External Remote Services (80%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (70%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (60%)
Valid Accounts (80%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (70%)
Valid Accounts (90%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (80%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (95%)
Defacement: Internal Defacement (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (70%)
Financial Theft
Financial Theft (95%)

Sources & References