Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Sogeni SA » SOG1776911028

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SOG1776911028)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-113
Company Score Before Incident750 / 1000
Company Score After Incident637 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERSOG1776911028
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDBusiness and financial documents, insurance...
INCIDENT DATE31/01/2026
STATUSResolved

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Sogeni SA's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Sogeni SA Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Sogeni SA breach identified under incident ID SOG1776911028.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Sogeni SA's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sogeni-sa, the number of followers: 179, the industry type: Legal Services and the number of employees: 7 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 750 and after the incident was 637 with a difference of -113 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Sogeni SA and their customers.

On 16 April 2026, Genealogy SA disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Genealogy SA Hit by SafePay Ransomware".

Genealogy SA, Australia’s largest family history society, was targeted in a ransomware attack by the SafePay gang.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Business and financial documents, insurance records, historic genealogical data, personal correspondence, internal templates.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notified affected members.

The case underscores how Resolved, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notified affected members.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating genealogy SA was targeted in a ransomware attack by SafePay and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating safePay gang listed the non-profit on its dark web leak site. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack by SafePay gang. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating business and financial documents, insurance records compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating historic genealogical data, personal correspondence, internal templates compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating safePay released compromised files on dark web leak site and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data leaked on dark web leak site. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack by SafePay gang and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attack threatening the organizations existence. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack by SafePay gang and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating engaged cybersecurity experts to contain and investigate. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (80%)
Data Destruction (50%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (60%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)