Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Social Capital GroupSocial Capital Group
VS
ConduentConduent
Social Capital Group

Social Capital Group

Calle Tacna 445, Lima, undefined, undefined, PE

Last Update: 07/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.s-c-g.net
751/1000Fair

Social Capital Group (SCG) is a leading professional services firm for social management in private and public sector investment projects. We have provided successful services in more than 30 countries. Since 1999 we have helped our clients understand the risks and oppo...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:157
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Conduent

Conduent

100 Campus Dr, Florham Park, 07932, US

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.conduent.com
100/1000Critical

Conduent delivers digital business solutions and services spanning the commercial, government and transportation spectrum – creating valuable outcomes for its clients and the millions of people who count on them. We leverage cloud computing, artificial intelligence, mac...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:39,366
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
9
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Social Capital Group

Social Capital Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Conduent

Conduent

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Social Capital Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Conduent has 791.09% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Social Capital Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Social Capital Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Conduent (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conduent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Social Capital Group

Social Capital Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Conduent

Conduent

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CON1789158547
🔒 Incident : Breach
CON1788525092
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ADOCONAFLSON1786027126

FAQ

Between Social Capital Group company and Conduent company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Social Capital Group company and Conduent company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Social Capital Group company and Conduent company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Social Capital Group company and Conduent company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Social Capital Group company and Conduent company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Social Capital Group company and Conduent company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Social Capital Group company and Conduent company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Social Capital Group company and Conduent company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Social Capital Group company and Conduent company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Social Capital Group company and Conduent company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Social Capital Group company and Conduent company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Social Capital Group and Conduent, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Social Capital Group and Conduent, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Social Capital Group or Conduent ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Social Capital Group or Conduent ?
Between Social Capital Group and Conduent, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Social Capital Group and Conduent, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9