Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SNP1769131589)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of SNP Group's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts SNP Group Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the SNP Group breach identified under incident ID SNP1769131589.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of SNP Group's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/snp-group, the number of followers: 50530, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 1586 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 753 and after the incident was 688 with a difference of -65 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on SNP Group and their customers.
On 16 January 2026, SNP Transformations, Inc. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "SNP Transformations Discloses Data Breach Affecting PII of Massachusetts Residents".
SNP Transformations, Inc., the North American arm of SNP Group, reported a data breach that compromised personally identifiable information (PII) of at least 15 individuals in Massachusetts, with potential wider exposure.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII), including full names, Social Security numbers, and driver’s license numbers, with nearly At least 15 (potential wider exposure) records at risk.
In response, and began remediation that includes Restored systems and implemented additional technical safeguards, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notified affected individuals via written notices on January 15, 2026; reported to Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation on January 16, 2026.
The case underscores how Ongoing (third-party cybersecurity experts engaged), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Affected individuals notified via written notices; offered 24 months of complimentary credit monitoring and identity restoration services through Experian (enrollment deadline: March 31, 2026). Support line: 833-918-8326.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to sensitive data and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating exact cause and responsible party remain undisclosed. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process (T1556) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to sensitive data including SSNs and Brute Force (T1110) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential wider exposure of PII. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating compromised PII including full names, SSNs, driver’s license numbers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting PII of at least 15 individuals. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to sensitive data and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating exact cause and responsible party remain undisclosed. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- SNP Group Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/snp-group/incident/SNP1769131589
- SNP Group CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/snp-group
- SNP Group Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/snp1769131589-snp-transformations-inc-breach-january-2026/
- SNP Group CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/snp-group/history
- SNP Group CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/data-breach/snp-schneider-neureither-partner-2026
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf