Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Smit LamnalcoSmit Lamnalco
VS
Hapag-Lloyd AGHapag-Lloyd AG
Smit Lamnalco

Smit Lamnalco

Waalhaven O.Z. 85, Rotterdam, Nederland, 3087 BM, NL

Last Update: 20/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.smitlamnalco.com
767/1000Fair

Smit Lamnalco provides first class, reliable and customised marine support in any environment. We ensure safe and efficient operations in any part of the world. Our quality is in our people. With their dedication, we go to extremes to deliver the best towage and relate...

NAICS:483
NAICS Definition:Water Transportation
Employees:1,339
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hapag-Lloyd AG

Hapag-Lloyd AG

Ballindamm 25, Hamburg, 20095, DE

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.hapag-lloyd.com
784/1000Fair

With a fleet of 302 modern container ships and a total transport capacity of 2.5 million TEU, Hapag-Lloyd is one of the world’s leading liner shipping companies. In the Liner Shipping segment, the Company has 15,200 employees and 400 offices in 140 countries. Hapag-Lloy...

NAICS:483
NAICS Definition:Water Transportation
Employees:15,801
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Smit Lamnalco

Smit Lamnalco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hapag-Lloyd AG

Hapag-Lloyd AG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smit Lamnalco in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

Hapag-Lloyd AG has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Smit Lamnalco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smit Lamnalco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hapag-Lloyd AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hapag-Lloyd AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Smit Lamnalco

Smit Lamnalco

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hapag-Lloyd AG

Hapag-Lloyd AG

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
HAP1789129613
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
HAP508092125

FAQ

Between Smit Lamnalco company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Smit Lamnalco company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Smit Lamnalco company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Smit Lamnalco company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Smit Lamnalco company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Smit Lamnalco company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Smit Lamnalco company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Smit Lamnalco company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Smit Lamnalco company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Smit Lamnalco company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Smit Lamnalco company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Smit Lamnalco and Hapag-Lloyd AG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Smit Lamnalco and Hapag-Lloyd AG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Smit Lamnalco or Hapag-Lloyd AG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Smit Lamnalco or Hapag-Lloyd AG ?
Between Smit Lamnalco and Hapag-Lloyd AG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Smit Lamnalco and Hapag-Lloyd AG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9