Comparison Overview
SmarterTools

SmarterTools
1903 W. Parkside Lane, #106, Phoenix, 85027, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Founded in 2003, SmarterTools Inc. is an information technology management software company that builds applications to help companies communicate, measure, and support their worldwide business operations. SmarterTools products serve thousands of companies across the gl...

Snowflake
Menlo Park, CA, US, 94563
Last Update: 14/04/2026
Snowflake delivers the AI Data Cloud — a global network where thousands of organizations mobilize data with near-unlimited scale, concurrency, and performance. Inside the AI Data Cloud, organizations unite their siloed data, easily discover and securely share governed d...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

SmarterTools







Snowflake






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
SmarterTools has 183.02% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Snowflake has 579.61% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - SmarterTools (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SmarterTools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Snowflake (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Snowflake cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

SmarterTools

Snowflake
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.