Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Small Business Britain » SMABUS1782729092

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SMABUS1782729092)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-98
Company Score Before Incident760 / 1000
Company Score After Incident662 / 1000
Company LinkView Small Business Britain Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERSMABUS1782729092
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE31/03/2025
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Small Business Britain's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Small Business Britain Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Small Business Britain breach identified under incident ID SMABUS1782729092.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Small Business Britain's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/smallbusinessbritain, the number of followers: 10199, the industry type: Non-profit Organizations and the number of employees: 21 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 760 and after the incident was 662 with a difference of -98 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Small Business Britain and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "UK Businesses Underreport Ransomware Attacks Amid Stigma and Compliance Fears", has drawn attention.

A growing reluctance among UK businesses to report ransomware attacks, particularly those involving ransom payments, is distorting the true scale of the threat.

The disruption is felt across the environment, plus an estimated financial loss of £270,000.

In response, and began remediation that includes Regular backups, strong access controls, adherence to NCSC guidance.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Underreporting of ransomware incidents due to stigma, compliance fears, and fear of funding criminal activity distorts the true scale of the threat, and recommending next steps like Proactive measures such as regular backups, strong access controls, and adherence to NCSC guidance to mitigate risks. Immediate reporting during an attack to access support, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Urges proactive measures and immediate reporting during an attack to access support.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating attack limited on finance or reputation,type such as Ransomware and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware incidents reported, likely initial access via unpatched systems. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attacks typically involve user execution of malicious payloads. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating type such as Ransomware, implies data encryption for ransom demands and Service Stop (T1489) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware often disrupts services to pressure victims. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion (T1497) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware may evade detection via sandboxing techniques and Indicator Removal: File Deletion (T1070.004) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware often deletes logs or artifacts to evade detection. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attacks may involve data exfiltration before encryption. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Service Stop (70%)
Defense Evasion
Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion (50%)
Indicator Removal: File Deletion (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)

Sources & References