Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » smallbusiness.co.uk » SMA1772857509

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SMA1772857509)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-22
Company Score Before Incident754 / 1000
Company Score After Incident732 / 1000
Company LinkView smallbusiness.co.uk Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERSMA1772857509
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2024
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of smallbusiness.co.uk's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts smallbusiness.co.uk Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the smallbusiness.co.uk breach identified under incident ID SMA1772857509.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of smallbusiness.co.uk's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/smallbusiness-uk, the number of followers: 3239, the industry type: Media Production and the number of employees: 3 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 754 and after the incident was 732 with a difference of -22 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on smallbusiness.co.uk and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "UK Small Businesses Face Alarming Surge in Cyberattacks", has drawn attention.

Nearly half of all small businesses in the UK experienced cyberattacks or breaches in the past year, according to the Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2025, released by the UK government.

Impact assessments are still underway, so the full scope is not yet clear.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as No business is beyond the reach of cyber threats; heightened vigilance and robust security measures are needed, and recommending next steps like Businesses urged to prioritize cybersecurity to mitigate financial, operational, and reputational damage, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Businesses urged to prioritize cybersecurity.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cybercriminals increasingly targeting organizations of all sizes and Phishing (T1566) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating nearly half of all small businesses in the UK experienced cyberattacks. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating growing threat landscape, with cybercriminals targeting organizations and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating small businesses experienced cyberattacks or breaches in the past year. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating financial, operational, and reputational damage and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating brand reputation impact such as Reputational damage. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattacks or breaches in the past year. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Phishing (60%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (40%)
Valid Accounts (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Defacement (30%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (40%)

Sources & References