Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Škoda Auto » SEASKOBENPORVOLAUTVOL1770202467

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SEASKOBENPORVOLAUTVOL1770202467)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-103
Company Score Before Incident718 / 1000
Company Score After Incident615 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERSEASKOBENPORVOLAUTVOL1770202467
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORPhishing, Purchased Credentials
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive data including invoices, receipts,...
INCIDENT DATE18/10/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Škoda Auto's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Škoda Auto Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Škoda Auto breach identified under incident ID SEASKOBENPORVOLAUTVOL1770202467.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Škoda Auto's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/skoda-auto, the number of followers: 165538, the industry type: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing and the number of employees: 9616 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 718 and after the incident was 615 with a difference of -103 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Škoda Auto and their customers.

On 23 September 2024, Volkswagen Group disclosed Data Extortion issues under the banner "Volkswagen Faces Data Extortion Threat from 8Base Ransomware Group".

Volkswagen Group is responding to claims by the ransomware group 8Base, which alleges it stole and leaked sensitive data from the automaker.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Third-party or partner systems (core IT infrastructure unaffected), and exposing Sensitive data including invoices, receipts, accounting documents, employee personal files, contracts, confidentiality agreements, certificates, and personnel records.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public statement acknowledging the incident.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating attack vector such as Phishing and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating attack vector such as Purchased Credentials. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Compromise Accounts (T1586) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating attack vector such as Purchased Credentials. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating employee personal files and contracts compromised and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating invoices, receipts, accounting documents exfiltrated. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data compromised such as sensitive data including invoices, receipts, etc. and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating third-party or partner systems affected. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration such as true, 8Base listed stolen data on dark web. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1471) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating phobos ransomware variant mentioned but no encryption confirmed and Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating 8Base threatened public release of stolen data. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating attack vector such as Purchased Credentials and Hide Artifacts (T1564) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating core IT infrastructure unaffected, suggesting stealthy access. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (90%)
Valid Accounts (80%)
Credential Access
Compromise Accounts (80%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (70%)
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Network Shared Drive (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (30%)
Defacement (50%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (80%)
Hide Artifacts (60%)