Comparison Overview
Sitejet

Sitejet
Klosterstraße 62, Berlin, 10179, DE
Last Update: 22/11/2025
Sitejet.io is launching the ultimate OS for web agencies and freelancers around the globe. Sitejet.io is the fastest, smoothest and most precise website editor on earth. Built from the ground up over a five-year period, every feature, tool, panel and function has been d...

PayPal
2211 North First Street, San Jose, 95131, US
Last Update: 13/10/2026
We're championing possibilities for all by making money fast, easy, and more enjoyable. Our hope is to unlock opportunities for people in their everyday lives and empower the millions of people and businesses around the world who trust, rely, and use PayPal every day. ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sitejet







PayPal






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sitejet in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
PayPal has 782.35% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Sitejet (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sitejet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - PayPal (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PayPal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sitejet

PayPal
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.