What is the official website of Sitecore Case Stories ?

The official website of Sitecore Case Stories is http://www.sitecore.net/customers/.

What is Sitecore Case Stories's cybersecurity risk score?

Sitecore Case Stories has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 769 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Sitecore Case Stories experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Sitecore Case Stories currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Sitecore Case Stories been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Sitecore Case Stories has been affected by a supply chain cyber incident involving Sitecore, with the incident ID SIT0155601090425.

Does Sitecore Case Stories have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Sitecore Case Stories is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Sitecore Case Stories have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Sitecore Case Stories does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Sitecore Case Stories comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Sitecore Case Stories is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Sitecore Case Stories have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Sitecore Case Stories does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Sitecore Case Stories comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Sitecore Case Stories is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Sitecore Case Stories have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Sitecore Case Stories is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Sitecore Case Stories operate in ?

Sitecore Case Stories operates primarily in the Software Development industry.

How many employees does Sitecore Case Stories have ?

Sitecore Case Stories employs approximately None employees people worldwide.

Does Sitecore Case Stories own any subsidiaries ?

Sitecore Case Stories presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Sitecore Case Stories have ?

Sitecore Case Stories's official LinkedIn profile has approximately followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Sitecore Case Stories ?

Sitecore Case Stories is classified under the NAICS code 5112, which corresponds to Software Publishers.

Does Sitecore Case Stories have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Sitecore Case Stories does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Sitecore Case Stories have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Sitecore Case Stories maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sitecore-case-stories.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Sitecore Case Stories experienced ?

As of October 20, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Sitecore Case Stories has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Sitecore Case Stories have ?

Sitecore Case Stories has an estimated 31,133 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Sitecore Case Stories faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Vulnerability.

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

SCS

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

769

/1000

Fair

794

/1000

Fair

Sitecore Case Stories Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

sitecore.net

Add Your Compliance Badge

Get an insight into some best practice cases of customers and their Sitecore solutions.

SCS

Sitecore Case Stories CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Sitecore

Vulnerability

100

6/2025

Sitecore

SIT015560109042...

Loading…

A.I.

SCS Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for SCS

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sitecore Case Stories in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sitecore Case Stories in 2026.

Incident Types SCS vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sitecore Case Stories in 2026.

Incident History - SCS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Sitecore Case Stories Subsidiaries

SCS

Software Development

Website: http://www.sitecore.net/customers/

Company Size: None employees

SitecoreSoftware Development

MoosendSoftware Development

Four51, Inc.Technology, Information and Internet

Sitecore ItaliaSoftware Development

Sitecore FranceSoftware Development

Loading…

Sitecore Case Stories Similar Companies

NiCE

nice.com

NiCE is transforming the world with AI that puts people first. Our purpose-built AI-powered platforms automate engagements into proactive, safe, intelligent actions, empowering individuals and organizations to innovate and act, from interaction to resolution. Trusted by organizations throughout 150+ countries worldwide, NiCE’s platforms are widely adopted across industries connecting people, systems, and workflows to work smarter at scale, elevating performance across the organization, delivering proven measurable outcomes.

SS&C Technologies

ssctech.com

SS&C is a leading global provider of mission-critical, cloud-based software and solutions for the financial and healthcare industries. Named to the Fortune 1000 list as a top U.S. company based on revenue, SS&C (NASDAQ: SSNC) is a trusted provider to more than 22,000 financial services and healthcare companies, with over 27,000 employees and operations in more than 35 countries. Built upon a foundation of expertise, innovation and excellent customer service, SS&C powers some of the largest financial and healthcare firms in the world. +++++++++++++++++ ALPS Portfolio Solutions Distributor, Inc., ALPS Advisors, ALPS Funds and SS&C Technologies are affiliated. Distributed by ALPS Portfolio Solutions Distributor, Inc. AN INVESTMENT IN THE FUNDS INVOLVES RISK, INCLUDING LOSS OF PRINCIPAL. AN INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES, RISKS, CHARGES AND EXPENSES CAREFULLY BEFORE INVESTING. TO OBTAIN A PROSPECTUS, WHICH CONTAINS THIS AND OTHER INFORMATION, CALL 1.877.398.8461 OR VISIT WWW.ALPSFUNDS.COM. READ THE PROSPECTUS CAREFULLY BEFORE INVESTING.

Airbnb

airbnb.com

Airbnb was born in 2007 when two hosts welcomed three guests to their San Francisco home, and has since grown to over 5 million hosts who have welcomed over 2 billion guest arrivals in almost every country across the globe. Every day, hosts offer unique stays, experiences and services that make it possible for guests to connect with communities in a more authentic way.

Shopify

cb shopify.com

Shopify is a leading global commerce company, providing trusted tools to start, grow, market, and manage a retail business of any size. Shopify makes commerce better for everyone with a platform and services that are engineered for reliability, while delivering a better shopping experience for consumers everywhere. Shopify powers millions of businesses in more than 175 countries and is trusted by brands such as Allbirds, Gymshark, PepsiCo, Staples, and many more. Find all our jobs here: www.shopify.com/careers

VMware

broadcom.com

Broadcom's VMware software manages cloud complexity so customers can modernize infrastructure, accelerate app development, and protect workloads, wherever these reside. Our flagship cloud solutions provide the security and performance of private cloud combined with the scale and agility of public cloud. Modern app, edge infrastructure, and private AI products extend these capabilities, while security and disaster recovery help ensure that customers’ operations continue uninterrupted. From the data center to the cloud and apps to the edge, we help enterprises around the globe become more innovative, connected, resilient and secure.

Workday

workday.com

By unifying HR and Finance on an open, trusted platform powered by AI, Workday delivers high-impact outcomes our customers can count on. At the heart of our platform is Sana from Workday—the superintelligence that puts AI agents to work for you and your people. Welcome to a new work day.

Alibaba.com

alibaba.com

The first business of Alibaba Group, Alibaba.com (www.alibaba.com) is the leading platform for global wholesale trade serving millions of buyers and suppliers around the world. Through Alibaba.com, small businesses can sell their products to companies in other countries. Sellers on Alibaba.com are typically manufacturers and distributors based in China and other manufacturing countries such as India, Pakistan, the United States and Thailand. Our Mission As part of the Alibaba Group, our mission is to make it easy to do business anywhere. We do this by giving suppliers the tools necessary to reach a global audience for their products, and by helping buyers find products and suppliers quickly and efficiently. One-Stop Sourcing Alibaba.com brings you hundreds of millions of products in over 40 different major categories, including consumer electronics, machinery and apparel. Buyers for these products are located in 190+ countries and regions, and exchange hundreds of thousands of messages with suppliers on the platform each day. Anytime, Anywhere As a platform, we continue to develop services to help businesses do more and discover new opportunities. Whether it’s sourcing from your mobile phone or contacting suppliers in their local language, turn to Alibaba.com for all your global business needs.

DoorDash

careersatdoordash.com

At DoorDash, our mission to empower local economies shapes how our team members move quickly and always learn and reiterate to support merchants, Dashers and the communities we serve. We are a technology and logistics company that started with door-to-door delivery, and we are looking for team members who can help us go from a company that is known for delivering food to a company that people turn to for any and all goods. DoorDash is growing rapidly and changing constantly, which gives our team members the opportunity to share their unique perspectives, solve new challenges, and own their careers. Our leaders seek the truth and welcome big, hairy, audacious questions. We are grounded in our company values, and we make intentional decisions that are both logical and display empathy for our range of users—from Dashers to Merchants to Customers.

Sitecore Case Stories CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

December 13, 2022 08:00 AM

Case Study: BHP website upgrade pivotal to improving speed to market, usability

BHP as a company has undergone some significant transformations as a business in the last 18 months, reflecting changes in commodities...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-77684

SUMMARY

The Bluetooth Classic Hands-Free Profile HF role in subsys/bluetooth/host/classic/hfp_hf.c does not release the AT command buffers that are still queued on hf->tx_pending when the RFCOMM DLC goes down. hfp_hf_disconnected() only cancelled the work items and cleared hf->acl, and no other code path ever dequeues those buffers, so each one is permanently lost from the fixed hf_pool (CONFIG_BT_MAX_CONN + 1 buffers, i.e. two in the default configuration). The same function also left BT_HFP_HF_FLAG_CONNECTED set, and hfp_hf_create() wiped the object with memset() as soon as hf->acl was NULL, without checking whether hf->work, hf->slc_work or hf->deferred_work was still pending or running. The remote Audio Gateway peer controls the trigger end to end and needs no application involvement: an unsolicited +BCS: 1 response makes bcs_handle() call bt_hfp_hf_select_codec() and queue an AT+BCS buffer, which cannot be transmitted while BT_HFP_HF_FLAG_RX_ONGOING is set, and an immediately following RFCOMM DISC strands that buffer. Repeating the connect / +BCS / disconnect cycle a couple of times empties hf_pool for good. With the pool exhausted, HFP command sending fails permanently, and because hfp_hf_send_cmd() allocates with K_FOREVER (bt_rfcomm_create_pdu() → bt_conn_create_pdu()) from the Bluetooth RX context — where that timeout is not downgraded to K_NO_WAIT — one further +BCS from the peer parks the Bluetooth RX thread inside net_buf_alloc() with no possible waker, halting all HCI event processing until the device is rebooted. Separately, reusing the HF slot while a work handler was still queued or running allowed memset() to wipe live k_work items out from under the system workqueue, corrupting shared kernel workqueue state. Exploitation requires an established HFP session (for SSP devices L2CAP enforces authentication before the RFCOMM channel is reachable) and a build with CONFIG_BT_HFP_HF enabled.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.1

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-19595

SUMMARY

The user-mode syscall verifier z_vrfy_rtio_cqe_get_mempool_buffer() in subsys/rtio/rtio_syscalls.c validated its two output parameters, buff and buff_len, with K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_READ() rather than K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_WRITE(). Both are pure out-parameters: z_impl_rtio_cqe_get_mempool_buffer() stores the mempool buffer address and its length through them. The distinction is enforced by every architecture validator — arch_buffer_validate() on RISC-V PMP explicitly accepts the global __rom_region/__rodata_region for reads only, and the ARM MPU validators accept P_RO_U_RO and P_RW_U_RO regions for reads only — so a read-validated pointer is not necessarily writable by the calling thread. An unprivileged user-mode thread that has been granted access to an RTIO context (rtio_access_grant()) can invoke the rtio_cqe_get_mempool_buffer() syscall with buff/buff_len pointing at memory it may read but not write, and with a completion-queue entry whose flags field it fully controls (only RTIO_CQE_FLAG_MEMPOOL_BUFFER in flags[7:0] is required; flags[19:8] and flags[31:20] supply the block index and count). The kernel then performs a pointer-sized and a 4-byte store through those addresses while running in supervisor mode. Reaching the store requires CONFIG_USERSPACE together with CONFIG_RTIO_SYS_MEM_BLOCKS, the configuration behind RTIO_DEFINE_WITH_MEMPOOL; without the latter the implementation returns -ENOTSUP and writes nothing. Two outcomes follow. If the target lies in a memory-domain partition declared K_MEM_PARTITION_P_RW_U_RO (privileged read-write, user read-only), the kernel-mode store succeeds and deposits partly attacker-chosen values into memory the memory domain had marked read-only for that thread, bypassing the partition's write protection. If the target lies in globally readable but unwritable memory such as .text/.rodata in flash, the store faults in kernel mode; the fault is delivered to z_fatal_error() and the default k_sys_fatal_error_handler() halts or reboots the device, giving an unprivileged thread a reliable full denial of service. The read-permission check does bound the damage: the address must still be readable by the calling thread, so kernel-private memory cannot be targeted and no confidential data is disclosed. The fix replaces both checks with K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_WRITE(), so a thread lacking write permission is terminated by K_OOPS before the implementation runs; the cqe argument correctly remains read-validated.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Impact Score

4.2

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-19178

SUMMARY

IBM Storage TS4500 Library 1.1.1.6 through 1.12.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain unauthorized administrative privileges due to a race condition.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.8

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Impact Score

5.2

Exploitability

1.6

REFERENCES

https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7292610

CVE-2026-112991

SUMMARY

The html_to_markdown expansion module in MISP Modules contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in its is_safe_url() URL validation function. The BLOCKED_RANGES list used to reject unsafe destination addresses was incomplete, omitting several critical IP address ranges. Specifically, the following ranges were not blocked: 0.0.0.0/8 (unspecified, which routes to loopback on Linux), 100.64.0.0/10 (carrier-grade NAT per RFC 6598), ::/128 (IPv6 unspecified), fc00::/7 (IPv6 Unique Local Addresses), and fe80::/10 (IPv6 link-local). The existing list only covered IPv4 loopback (127.0.0.0/8), RFC 1918 private ranges, IPv4 link-local (169.254.0.0/16), and IPv6 loopback (::1/128). An authenticated user with the ability to create or modify MISP attributes that trigger the html_to_markdown expansion module could supply URLs pointing to these unblocked internal address ranges. Because the module fetches the URL server-side to convert HTML content to Markdown, the request is made from the MISP server's network context. This allows an attacker to probe and read responses from internal services, carrier-grade NAT infrastructure, or link-local endpoints that would otherwise be unreachable from external networks. IPv4-mapped IPv6 forms (e.g., [::ffff:0.0.0.0]) also bypassed the existing checks. The security impact is primarily confidentiality: an attacker can read data served by internal services reachable from the MISP server. The MISP instance itself is not compromised, but it is abused as a proxy to access otherwise restricted network resources.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/misp/misp-modules/commit/98a1c2c2f297665dd8d4609e9cd644007a57516b

CVE-2026-112372

SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in H3C Magic NX15 V100R017. This affects the function importprofile of the file /api/upload. This manipulation of the argument fileName causes path traversal. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)

cvss2

Base Score: 5.8

Complexity: LOW

AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P

cvss3

Base Score: 6.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 2.0

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.7

Exploitability

2.3

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Sitecore Case Stories Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

SCS A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Sitecore Case Stories CyberSecurity News & History

SCS Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for SCS

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types SCS vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - SCS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sitecore Case Stories Subsidiaries

SCS

Sitecore Case Stories Similar Companies

NiCE

SS&C Technologies

Airbnb

Shopify

VMware

Workday

Alibaba.com

DoorDash

Meta

Sitecore Case Stories CyberSecurity News

Case Study: BHP website upgrade pivotal to improving speed to market, usability

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo

Sitecore Case Stories CyberSecurity News & History

SCS Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for SCS

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types SCS vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - SCS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sitecore Case Stories Subsidiaries

SCS

Sitecore Case Stories Similar Companies

NiCE

SS&C Technologies

Airbnb

Shopify

VMware

Workday

Alibaba.com

DoorDash

Meta

Sitecore Case Stories CyberSecurity News

Case Study: BHP website upgrade pivotal to improving speed to market, usability

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo