ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

With nearly two decades of experience in tracking and analyzing the online activity of global extremist networks, SITE’s advanced threat monitoring and analysis services are unparalleled. SITE monitors online threats worldwide from terrorist organizations, jihadists, hackers, far-right/far-left movements, and other groups. We provide a range of products and services, with specialized monitoring and analytical reports tailored to different sectors. Our clients include governments and law enforcement agencies worldwide, Fortune 500 companies, major media outlets, academic institutions, and more. LIST OF MONITORING SERVICES SITE’s team of expert analysts are uniquely qualified to provide 24/7 monitoring of online open-source material that is challenging to locate, assess, and contextualize. SITE immediately translates material (videos, audios, statements, communiques, and more) and provides a contextual analysis, explaining its source, authentication, and significance. New alerts are circulated by email, and all content is logged into SITE’s interactive database, comprised of tens of thousands of reports tagged by category, location, group, individuals, etc. Multimedia, such as video or audio messages, are also streamed on our website through SITE’s secure server. Each SITE monitoring service is available individually for subscription; services can also be bundled together for package rates. Special rates are available for non-profit institutions. - SITE Jihadist Threat Enterprise - SITE Jihadist Threat: Southeast Asia - Far-Right / Far-Left - Dark Web & Cyber Security - GuideTracker: Tracking Online Terror Training Manuals - inSITE on the Islamic State - inSITE on Al Qaeda - inSITE on Western Jihadists - inSITE on HTS - inSITE on Terrorism and Technology - Terrorism & Finance - Energy & Critical Infrastructure - SOURCEFEED: Combatting Terrorist Exploitation of Online Technologies - Customized Services Read more on www.siteintelgroup.com

SITE Intelligence Group A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

SIG

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

site-intelligence-group

Employees number:

2

Number of followers:

9,982

NAICS:

5616

Industry Type:

Security and Investigations

Homepage:

siteintelgroup.com

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

SIT_9603522

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreSIG Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 550 and 599

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/site-intelligence-group.jpeg
SIG Security and Investigations
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreSIG Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/site-intelligence-group.jpeg
SIG Security and Investigations
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

SIG Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
2
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsIncident DetailsView
**Unspecified (General Consumer Data Breach Context)**Breach8546/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The article discusses a **large-scale data breach** exposing **consumers' sensitive personal information**, including financial data (e.g., bank statements, credit card details), government-issued IDs (e.g., Social Security numbers, driver’s licenses), and biometric data (e.g., Face ID vulnerabilities). The breach stems from **hackers stealing information from company servers**, **employee mishandling of data**, or **accidental exposure of private records**. Affected individuals face risks of **identity theft, fraudulent account openings, and financial losses**, with children’s data also being targeted. The breach’s magnitude suggests systemic vulnerabilities, potentially involving **phishing scams, malware, or spyware** to compromise passwords and devices. Victims are advised to freeze credit, enable two-factor authentication, and monitor transactions, indicating the breach’s severity extends beyond immediate financial harm to long-term reputational and operational damage for the implicated organization(s). The lack of a specific company name implies a **broad, industry-wide pattern** of high-impact consumer data leaks.

Unspecified Enterprise (Targeted by Kraken Ransomware)Ransomware100511/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: The Kraken ransomware campaign executed a sophisticated attack by first benchmarking system performance to optimize encryption speed and damage. Before encryption, it deleted shadow copies, cleared the Recycle Bin, and disabled backup services across Windows, Linux, and ESXi systems to prevent recovery. The malware targeted critical enterprise assets, including SQL databases, network shares, local drives, and Hyper-V/ESXi virtual machines, halting active VMs to unlock disks for encryption. Post-encryption, it wiped logs, shell history, and the binary itself, leaving files with a **.zpsc** extension and a ransom note (**readme_you_ws_hacked.txt**) demanding **$1 million in Bitcoin**. Attackers gained initial access via exposed **vulnerable SMB services**, harvested admin credentials, and re-entered using **Remote Desktop**. Persistence was maintained through **Cloudflare tunnels**, while **SSHFS** enabled lateral movement and data exfiltration. The attack disrupted operations by encrypting core systems, crippling virtualized environments, and potentially exposing sensitive data. The group, linked to the defunct **HelloKitty ransomware**, also launched an underground forum (**The Last Haven Board**) to coordinate cybercriminal activities. The incident highlights severe operational and financial risks, with potential long-term reputational damage and regulatory scrutiny due to compromised credentials, disabled backups, and encrypted critical infrastructure.

**Unspecified (General Consumer Data Breach Context)**
Breach
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 6/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The article discusses a **large-scale data breach** exposing **consumers' sensitive personal information**, including financial data (e.g., bank statements, credit card details), government-issued IDs (e.g., Social Security numbers, driver’s licenses), and biometric data (e.g., Face ID vulnerabilities). The breach stems from **hackers stealing information from company servers**, **employee mishandling of data**, or **accidental exposure of private records**. Affected individuals face risks of **identity theft, fraudulent account openings, and financial losses**, with children’s data also being targeted. The breach’s magnitude suggests systemic vulnerabilities, potentially involving **phishing scams, malware, or spyware** to compromise passwords and devices. Victims are advised to freeze credit, enable two-factor authentication, and monitor transactions, indicating the breach’s severity extends beyond immediate financial harm to long-term reputational and operational damage for the implicated organization(s). The lack of a specific company name implies a **broad, industry-wide pattern** of high-impact consumer data leaks.

Unspecified Enterprise (Targeted by Kraken Ransomware)
Ransomware
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 11/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: The Kraken ransomware campaign executed a sophisticated attack by first benchmarking system performance to optimize encryption speed and damage. Before encryption, it deleted shadow copies, cleared the Recycle Bin, and disabled backup services across Windows, Linux, and ESXi systems to prevent recovery. The malware targeted critical enterprise assets, including SQL databases, network shares, local drives, and Hyper-V/ESXi virtual machines, halting active VMs to unlock disks for encryption. Post-encryption, it wiped logs, shell history, and the binary itself, leaving files with a **.zpsc** extension and a ransom note (**readme_you_ws_hacked.txt**) demanding **$1 million in Bitcoin**. Attackers gained initial access via exposed **vulnerable SMB services**, harvested admin credentials, and re-entered using **Remote Desktop**. Persistence was maintained through **Cloudflare tunnels**, while **SSHFS** enabled lateral movement and data exfiltration. The attack disrupted operations by encrypting core systems, crippling virtualized environments, and potentially exposing sensitive data. The group, linked to the defunct **HelloKitty ransomware**, also launched an underground forum (**The Last Haven Board**) to coordinate cybercriminal activities. The incident highlights severe operational and financial risks, with potential long-term reputational damage and regulatory scrutiny due to compromised credentials, disabled backups, and encrypted critical infrastructure.

Ailogo

SIG Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for SIG

Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Average (This Year)

SITE Intelligence Group has 173.97% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

SITE Intelligence Group has 212.5% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident Types SIG vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)

SITE Intelligence Group reported 2 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 1 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 1 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.

Incident History — SIG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SIG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

SIG Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

With nearly two decades of experience in tracking and analyzing the online activity of global extremist networks, SITE’s advanced threat monitoring and analysis services are unparalleled. SITE monitors online threats worldwide from terrorist organizations, jihadists, hackers, far-right/far-left movements, and other groups. We provide a range of products and services, with specialized monitoring and analytical reports tailored to different sectors. Our clients include governments and law enforcement agencies worldwide, Fortune 500 companies, major media outlets, academic institutions, and more. LIST OF MONITORING SERVICES SITE’s team of expert analysts are uniquely qualified to provide 24/7 monitoring of online open-source material that is challenging to locate, assess, and contextualize. SITE immediately translates material (videos, audios, statements, communiques, and more) and provides a contextual analysis, explaining its source, authentication, and significance. New alerts are circulated by email, and all content is logged into SITE’s interactive database, comprised of tens of thousands of reports tagged by category, location, group, individuals, etc. Multimedia, such as video or audio messages, are also streamed on our website through SITE’s secure server. Each SITE monitoring service is available individually for subscription; services can also be bundled together for package rates. Special rates are available for non-profit institutions. - SITE Jihadist Threat Enterprise - SITE Jihadist Threat: Southeast Asia - Far-Right / Far-Left - Dark Web & Cyber Security - GuideTracker: Tracking Online Terror Training Manuals - inSITE on the Islamic State - inSITE on Al Qaeda - inSITE on Western Jihadists - inSITE on HTS - inSITE on Terrorism and Technology - Terrorism & Finance - Energy & Critical Infrastructure - SOURCEFEED: Combatting Terrorist Exploitation of Online Technologies - Customized Services Read more on www.siteintelgroup.com

Loading...
similarCompanies

SIG Similar Companies

Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.

Securitas knows Security. It is our only business. As The Leader in Protective Services, we invest in people, knowledge and technology to deliver customized, cost-effective and class-leading solutions. Our parent company, Securitas AB, is a global company headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden and emplo

Gendarmerie Nationale

Force humaine de près de 100 000 hommes et femmes placée sous l’autorité du ministère de l’Intérieur, la Gendarmerie nationale est une institution militaire garante de la sécurité et de la paix de nos concitoyens, et de la protection de leurs biens. Elle assure des missions de police judiciaire, d'a

G4S is a leading security and facility services company that provides proactive security services and cutting-edge smart technology to deliver tailored, integrated security solutions that allow clients to focus on their core business. Through a global workforce of approximately 800,000 people, we le

Fidelity Services Group

Fidelity Services Group is Southern Africa’s largest integrated security solutions provider and the industry leader in protection innovation. Excellence in service delivery and implementation are fundamental to our impressive record of accomplishments. By keeping abreast of the latest trends and te

Securitas Nederland

Door de juiste inzet van mens, kennis en techniek vinden we de ideale ‘veiligheidsbalans’ voor iedere situatie. Dat begint altijd met heel goed luisteren om zo te doorgronden wat de specifieke omstandigheden en wensen van de klant zijn. Vervolgens groeien we samen naar de gewenste situatie waarin de

GardaWorld

GardaWorld is the world’s largest privately-owned security services company, offering cash services, physical and specialized security solutions, and with our Crisis24 portal, the dissemination of verified information related to international security. GardaWorld est la plus importante entreprise

Prosegur

At Prosegur, being aware of who we are is what defines our identity and commitment. 🌐 We are Prosegur. Leaders in the private security sector for more than 45 years and in more than 30 countries. 💡 We are innovation. We reinvent ourselves, adapt and integrate trends to offer more advanced security.

NISA Industrial Services pvt Ltd

Late Commander Datar. Singh. Sahi on retirement after 30 years of illustrious service in the Indian Navy, co-founded NISA along with his son and co-founder Mr. Paramjeet Singh Sahi, in 1973. Poised on their combination of youth and experience in specialised expertise in Security Management Systems,

Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços

One of the largest companies in the professional services and security markets in Brazil. Formed by four branches, patrimonial security, personal security, electronic security and general services. Counting with around 16.000 employees, Gocil is present at several brazillian states and offers its se

newsone

SIG CyberSecurity News

November 13, 2025 08:00 AM
Disrupting the first reported AI-orchestrated cyber espionage campaign

We recently argued that an inflection point had been reached in cybersecurity: a point at which AI models had become genuinely useful for...

November 05, 2025 08:00 AM
GTIG AI Threat Tracker: Advances in Threat Actor Usage of AI Tools

Google Threat Intelligence Group's findings on adversarial misuse of AI, including Gemini and other non-Google tools.

October 28, 2025 07:00 AM
Google probes exploitation of critical Windows service CVE

Researchers have traced the threat activity to a newly identified hacker, while separate evidence points to more than one variant.

October 10, 2025 07:00 AM
CL0P-Linked Hackers Breach Dozens of Organizations Through Oracle Software Flaw

Oracle EBS zero-day CVE-2025-61882 exploited since August 2025; GTIG links campaign to Cl0p actors.

October 02, 2025 07:00 AM
Google Mandiant Probes New Oracle Extortion Wave Possibly Linked to Cl0p Ransomware

Google Mandiant and Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) have disclosed that they are tracking a new cluster of activity possibly linked...

October 02, 2025 07:00 AM
Hackers claiming ties to Clop launch wide extortion campaign targeting corporate executives

The email-based campaign purports to have sensitive data from breached Oracle E-Business Suite applications.

September 22, 2025 07:00 AM
43 Top Cybersecurity Companies to Know 2025

These companies block online threats, assess industry vulnerabilities and increase education and awareness about cybersecurity.

September 04, 2025 07:00 AM
Russian APT28 Deploys "NotDoor" Outlook Backdoor Against Companies in NATO Countries

The Russian state-sponsored hacking group tracked as APT28 has been attributed to a new Microsoft Outlook backdoor called NotDoor in attacks...

August 14, 2025 07:00 AM
Choosing the Right Cyber Threat Intelligence Tool

Today's cybersecurity pros know how important it is to have good threat intelligence. Such information affects so many aspects of an...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

SIG CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of SITE Intelligence Group

The official website of SITE Intelligence Group is http://ent.siteintelgroup.com.

SITE Intelligence Group’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, SITE Intelligence Group’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 583, reflecting their Very Poor security posture.

How many security badges does SITE Intelligence Group’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, SITE Intelligence Group currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Does SITE Intelligence Group have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, SITE Intelligence Group is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does SITE Intelligence Group have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, SITE Intelligence Group does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does SITE Intelligence Group comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, SITE Intelligence Group is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does SITE Intelligence Group have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, SITE Intelligence Group does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does SITE Intelligence Group comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, SITE Intelligence Group is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does SITE Intelligence Group have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,SITE Intelligence Group is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of SITE Intelligence Group

SITE Intelligence Group operates primarily in the Security and Investigations industry.

Number of Employees at SITE Intelligence Group

SITE Intelligence Group employs approximately 2 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by SITE Intelligence Group

SITE Intelligence Group presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

SITE Intelligence Group’s LinkedIn Followers

SITE Intelligence Group’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 9,982 followers.

NAICS Classification of SITE Intelligence Group

SITE Intelligence Group is classified under the NAICS code 5616, which corresponds to Investigation and Security Services.

SITE Intelligence Group’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, SITE Intelligence Group does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

SITE Intelligence Group’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, SITE Intelligence Group maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/site-intelligence-group.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving SITE Intelligence Group

As of December 04, 2025, Rankiteo reports that SITE Intelligence Group has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

SITE Intelligence Group has an estimated 3,570 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at SITE Intelligence Group ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware and Breach.

What was the total financial impact of these incidents on SITE Intelligence Group ?

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $0.

How does SITE Intelligence Group detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with cisco talos (research/analysis), and remediation measures with log clearing, remediation measures with binary deletion, remediation measures with evidence elimination (by attackers), remediation measures with ransom note deployment..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Hacking)

Title: None

Description: Large data breaches exposing consumers' sensitive personal information have become routine. The article discusses three major types of data breaches: (1) hackers stealing information from company servers, (2) employees stealing or mishandling company information, and (3) private information accidentally being exposed. It also highlights risks from compromised personal devices, passwords, spyware, malware, or phishing scams. The article provides steps for consumers to protect themselves post-breach, including credit freezes, fraud alerts, password changes, credit report monitoring, and disputing suspicious charges.

Type: Data Breach (Hacking)

Attack Vector: Server ExploitationInsider ThreatAccidental DisclosurePhishingMalware/SpywareDevice Theft

Threat Actor: Hackers (External)Malicious Insiders (Employees)Opportunistic Criminals (via Phishing/Malware)

Motivation: Financial GainIdentity TheftFraud

Incident : ransomware

Title: Kraken Ransomware Campaign with Benchmark-Driven Encryption

Description: The Kraken ransomware campaign introduces a benchmark step that measures system performance to determine the scale of encryption. It deletes shadow copies, Recycle Bin, and backups before encrypting files across Windows, Linux, and ESXi systems. The malware uses stolen credentials and exploits vulnerable SMB services for initial access, maintaining persistence via Cloudflare tunnels and SSHFS. Ransom demands have reached $1 million in Bitcoin, with operational ties to the former HelloKitty ransomware group.

Type: ransomware

Attack Vector: exploiting vulnerable SMB servicesharvesting administrator credentialsRemote Desktop (RDP) re-entryCloudflare tunnels for persistenceSSHFS for lateral movement

Vulnerability Exploited: exposed SMB servicesweak or stolen credentials

Threat Actor: Kraken ransomware group (linked to former HelloKitty group)

Motivation: financial gaindisruptiondata theft

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Compromised Company ServersInsider Access (Employees)Phishing/Malware (Consumer Devices)Stolen Personal Devices and vulnerable SMB servicesstolen administrator credentials.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Hacking) SIT2741927100525

Financial Loss: Potential (varies per individual; includes unauthorized transactions, identity theft, and credit damage)

Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Financial data (e.g., banking passwords), Credit history, Child identity data (if applicable)

Customer Complaints: Likely (due to exposed data and fraud risks)

Brand Reputation Impact: High (erodes consumer trust in affected organizations)

Legal Liabilities: Potential (state breach notification laws may impose penalties or require credit monitoring services for victims)

Identity Theft Risk: High

Payment Information Risk: High (if financial data or passwords are compromised)

Incident : ransomware SIT4562145111925

Systems Affected: Windows systemsLinux systemsESXi systemsSQL databasesnetwork shareslocal drivesHyper-V virtual machines

Downtime: True

Operational Impact: file encryption (.zpsc extension)deletion of shadow copies/backupstermination of virtual machineslog clearingevidence elimination

What is the average financial loss per incident ?

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $0.00.

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Pii (E.G., Names, Ssns, Birth Certificates), Financial Data (E.G., Banking Credentials), Credit Information, Child Identity Data, , Enterprise Data, Sql Databases, Virtual Machine Disks, Network Shares, Local Files and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Hacking) SIT2741927100525

Entity Type: Consumers (General Public)

Customers Affected: Mass-scale (no specific number provided)

Incident : ransomware SIT4562145111925

Entity Type: enterprise organizations, businesses with exposed SMB services

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : ransomware SIT4562145111925

Third Party Assistance: Cisco Talos (Research/Analysis).

Remediation Measures: log clearingbinary deletionevidence elimination (by attackers)ransom note deployment

How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Cisco Talos (research/analysis), .

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Data Breach (Hacking) SIT2741927100525

Type of Data Compromised: Pii (e.g., names, ssns, birth certificates), Financial data (e.g., banking credentials), Credit information, Child identity data

Sensitivity of Data: High (includes financial and identity-sensitive information)

Data Exfiltration: Likely (for hacking/insider cases)

Incident : ransomware SIT4562145111925

Type of Data Compromised: Enterprise data, Sql databases, Virtual machine disks, Network shares, Local files

Data Encryption: True

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: log clearing, binary deletion, evidence elimination (by attackers), ransom note deployment, .

Ransomware Information

Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?

Incident : ransomware SIT4562145111925

Ransom Demanded: $1 million (in Bitcoin)

Ransomware Strain: Kraken

Data Encryption: True

Data Exfiltration: True

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Hacking) SIT2741927100525

Regulations Violated: State Breach Notification Laws (varies by jurisdiction)

Legal Actions: Potential (consumer benefits like credit monitoring may be mandated)

Regulatory Notifications: Required (per state laws)

How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Potential (consumer benefits like credit monitoring may be mandated).

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Hacking) SIT2741927100525

Lessons Learned: Consumers must proactively monitor credit and financial accounts post-breach., Credit freezes and fraud alerts are critical tools to mitigate identity theft risks., Password hygiene (e.g., frequent changes, 2FA) reduces exposure from credential theft., Biometric authentication alone is insufficient due to AI-driven spoofing risks., State laws provide some recourse, but individual vigilance remains essential.

Incident : ransomware SIT4562145111925

Lessons Learned: Limit exposure of internet-facing services (e.g., SMB)., Enforce strong authentication and access controls., Maintain updated backups and test restoration processes., Monitor for unusual activity (e.g., benchmarking tests, credential harvesting)., Segment networks to limit lateral movement., Patch vulnerabilities promptly to prevent exploitation.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Data Breach (Hacking) SIT2741927100525

Recommendations:

Incident : ransomware SIT4562145111925

Recommendations: Deploy strong ransomware protection (e.g., behavioral detection, endpoint security)., Ensure backups are immutable and offline., Implement network segmentation to isolate critical systems., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for remote access., Regularly audit and rotate credentials., Monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) associated with Kraken., Restrict internet-facing services like RDP and SMB., Update antivirus/anti-malware solutions and conduct regular scans.Deploy strong ransomware protection (e.g., behavioral detection, endpoint security)., Ensure backups are immutable and offline., Implement network segmentation to isolate critical systems., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for remote access., Regularly audit and rotate credentials., Monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) associated with Kraken., Restrict internet-facing services like RDP and SMB., Update antivirus/anti-malware solutions and conduct regular scans.Deploy strong ransomware protection (e.g., behavioral detection, endpoint security)., Ensure backups are immutable and offline., Implement network segmentation to isolate critical systems., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for remote access., Regularly audit and rotate credentials., Monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) associated with Kraken., Restrict internet-facing services like RDP and SMB., Update antivirus/anti-malware solutions and conduct regular scans.Deploy strong ransomware protection (e.g., behavioral detection, endpoint security)., Ensure backups are immutable and offline., Implement network segmentation to isolate critical systems., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for remote access., Regularly audit and rotate credentials., Monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) associated with Kraken., Restrict internet-facing services like RDP and SMB., Update antivirus/anti-malware solutions and conduct regular scans.Deploy strong ransomware protection (e.g., behavioral detection, endpoint security)., Ensure backups are immutable and offline., Implement network segmentation to isolate critical systems., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for remote access., Regularly audit and rotate credentials., Monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) associated with Kraken., Restrict internet-facing services like RDP and SMB., Update antivirus/anti-malware solutions and conduct regular scans.Deploy strong ransomware protection (e.g., behavioral detection, endpoint security)., Ensure backups are immutable and offline., Implement network segmentation to isolate critical systems., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for remote access., Regularly audit and rotate credentials., Monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) associated with Kraken., Restrict internet-facing services like RDP and SMB., Update antivirus/anti-malware solutions and conduct regular scans.Deploy strong ransomware protection (e.g., behavioral detection, endpoint security)., Ensure backups are immutable and offline., Implement network segmentation to isolate critical systems., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for remote access., Regularly audit and rotate credentials., Monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) associated with Kraken., Restrict internet-facing services like RDP and SMB., Update antivirus/anti-malware solutions and conduct regular scans.Deploy strong ransomware protection (e.g., behavioral detection, endpoint security)., Ensure backups are immutable and offline., Implement network segmentation to isolate critical systems., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for remote access., Regularly audit and rotate credentials., Monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) associated with Kraken., Restrict internet-facing services like RDP and SMB., Update antivirus/anti-malware solutions and conduct regular scans.

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Consumers must proactively monitor credit and financial accounts post-breach.,Credit freezes and fraud alerts are critical tools to mitigate identity theft risks.,Password hygiene (e.g., frequent changes, 2FA) reduces exposure from credential theft.,Biometric authentication alone is insufficient due to AI-driven spoofing risks.,State laws provide some recourse, but individual vigilance remains essential.Limit exposure of internet-facing services (e.g., SMB).,Enforce strong authentication and access controls.,Maintain updated backups and test restoration processes.,Monitor for unusual activity (e.g., benchmarking tests, credential harvesting).,Segment networks to limit lateral movement.,Patch vulnerabilities promptly to prevent exploitation.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Hacking) SIT2741927100525

Source: Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

URL: https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/

Incident : Data Breach (Hacking) SIT2741927100525

Source: NerdWallet - Credit Freeze Guide

URL: https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/finance/credit-freeze

Incident : Data Breach (Hacking) SIT2741927100525

Source: AnnualCreditReport.com

URL: https://www.annualcreditreport.com/

Incident : ransomware SIT4562145111925

Source: Cisco Talos Research

Incident : ransomware SIT4562145111925

Source: TechRadar Pro

URL: https://www.techradar.com

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Federal Trade Commission (FTC)Url: https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/, and Source: NerdWallet - Credit Freeze GuideUrl: https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/finance/credit-freeze, and Source: AnnualCreditReport.comUrl: https://www.annualcreditreport.com/, and Source: Cisco Talos Research, and Source: TechRadar ProUrl: https://www.techradar.com.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : ransomware SIT4562145111925

Investigation Status: Ongoing (public IoCs documented by Cisco Talos)

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Hacking) SIT2741927100525

Customer Advisories: Freeze credit immediately to prevent new account fraud.Use fraud alerts as a temporary alternative if credit access is needed.Enable 2FA and update passwords for all critical accounts.Monitor credit reports and card statements for signs of fraud.Leverage state-mandated benefits (e.g., credit monitoring) if offered post-breach.

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Freeze Credit Immediately To Prevent New Account Fraud., Use Fraud Alerts As A Temporary Alternative If Credit Access Is Needed., Enable 2Fa And Update Passwords For All Critical Accounts., Monitor Credit Reports And Card Statements For Signs Of Fraud., Leverage State-Mandated Benefits (E.G., Credit Monitoring) If Offered Post-Breach. and .

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Hacking) SIT2741927100525

Entry Point: Compromised Company Servers, Insider Access (Employees), Phishing/Malware (Consumer Devices), Stolen Personal Devices,

High Value Targets: Financial Data, Pii (Ssns, Birth Certificates), Credit Histories,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Financial Data, Pii (Ssns, Birth Certificates), Credit Histories,

Incident : ransomware SIT4562145111925

Entry Point: Vulnerable Smb Services, Stolen Administrator Credentials,

Backdoors Established: ['Cloudflare tunnels', 'SSHFS for lateral movement']

High Value Targets: Sql Databases, Virtual Machines (Hyper-V, Esxi), Network Shares,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Sql Databases, Virtual Machines (Hyper-V, Esxi), Network Shares,

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Hacking) SIT2741927100525

Root Causes: Inadequate Server Security (For Hacking Cases), Lack Of Insider Threat Monitoring, Human Error (Accidental Exposure), Poor Consumer Password Hygiene, Susceptibility To Phishing/Malware,

Incident : ransomware SIT4562145111925

Root Causes: Exposed Smb Services With Weak Credentials., Lack Of Network Segmentation Allowing Lateral Movement., Insufficient Monitoring For Benchmarking Or Pre-Encryption Activities., Inadequate Backup Protection (Shadow Copies/Recycle Bin Deleted).,

Corrective Actions: Isolate And Patch Exposed Services., Implement Credential Hygiene And Mfa., Deploy Behavioral-Based Detection For Ransomware Activities., Enhance Logging And Monitoring For Unusual Processes (E.G., Test File Encryption)., Secure Backups With Immutability And Air-Gapping.,

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Cisco Talos (Research/Analysis), .

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Isolate And Patch Exposed Services., Implement Credential Hygiene And Mfa., Deploy Behavioral-Based Detection For Ransomware Activities., Enhance Logging And Monitoring For Unusual Processes (E.G., Test File Encryption)., Secure Backups With Immutability And Air-Gapping., .

Additional Questions

General Information

What was the amount of the last ransom demanded ?

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was $1 million (in Bitcoin).

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Hackers (External)Malicious Insiders (Employees)Opportunistic Criminals (via Phishing/Malware) and Kraken ransomware group (linked to former HelloKitty group).

Impact of the Incidents

What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was Potential (varies per individual; includes unauthorized transactions, identity theft, and credit damage).

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Financial Data (e.g., banking passwords), Credit History, Child Identity Data (if applicable), and .

What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Windows systemsLinux systemsESXi systemsSQL databasesnetwork shareslocal drivesHyper-V virtual machines.

Response to the Incidents

What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was cisco talos (research/analysis), .

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Financial Data (e.g., banking passwords), Child Identity Data (if applicable), Personally Identifiable Information (PII) and Credit History.

Ransomware Information

What was the highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident ?

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was $1 million (in Bitcoin).

Regulatory Compliance

What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Potential (consumer benefits like credit monitoring may be mandated).

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Patch vulnerabilities promptly to prevent exploitation.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Deploy strong ransomware protection (e.g., behavioral detection, endpoint security)., Restrict internet-facing services like RDP and SMB., Implement network segmentation to isolate critical systems., Regularly audit and rotate credentials., Ensure backups are immutable and offline., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for remote access., Update antivirus/anti-malware solutions and conduct regular scans. and Monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) associated with Kraken..

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Federal Trade Commission (FTC), NerdWallet - Credit Freeze Guide, TechRadar Pro, AnnualCreditReport.com and Cisco Talos Research.

What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/, https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/finance/credit-freeze, https://www.annualcreditreport.com/, https://www.techradar.com .

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (public IoCs documented by Cisco Talos).

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Freeze credit immediately to prevent new account fraud.Use fraud alerts as a temporary alternative if credit access is needed.Enable 2FA and update passwords for all critical accounts.Monitor credit reports and card statements for signs of fraud.Leverage state-mandated benefits (e.g. and credit monitoring) if offered post-breach.

Initial Access Broker

Post-Incident Analysis

What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Inadequate server security (for hacking cases)Lack of insider threat monitoringHuman error (accidental exposure)Poor consumer password hygieneSusceptibility to phishing/malware, Exposed SMB services with weak credentials.Lack of network segmentation allowing lateral movement.Insufficient monitoring for benchmarking or pre-encryption activities.Inadequate backup protection (shadow copies/Recycle Bin deleted)..

What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Isolate and patch exposed services.Implement credential hygiene and MFA.Deploy behavioral-based detection for ransomware activities.Enhance logging and monitoring for unusual processes (e.g., test file encryption).Secure backups with immutability and air-gapping..

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=site-intelligence-group' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge