SITE Intelligence Group Company CyberSecurity Posture

siteintelgroup.com
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

With nearly two decades of experience in tracking and analyzing the online activity of global extremist networks, SITE’s advanced threat monitoring and analysis services are unparalleled. SITE monitors online threats worldwide from terrorist organizations, jihadists, hackers, far-right/far-left movements, and other groups. We provide a range of products and services, with specialized monitoring and analytical reports tailored to different sectors. Our clients include governments and law enforcement agencies worldwide, Fortune 500 companies, major media outlets, academic institutions, and more. LIST OF MONITORING SERVICES SITE’s team of expert analysts are uniquely qualified to provide 24/7 monitoring of online open-source material that is challenging to locate, assess, and contextualize. SITE immediately translates material (videos, audios, statements, communiques, and more) and provides a contextual analysis, explaining its source, authentication, and significance. New alerts are circulated by email, and all content is logged into SITE’s interactive database, comprised of tens of thousands of reports tagged by category, location, group, individuals, etc. Multimedia, such as video or audio messages, are also streamed on our website through SITE’s secure server. Each SITE monitoring service is available individually for subscription; services can also be bundled together for package rates. Special rates are available for non-profit institutions. - SITE Jihadist Threat Enterprise - SITE Jihadist Threat: Southeast Asia - Far-Right / Far-Left - Dark Web & Cyber Security - GuideTracker: Tracking Online Terror Training Manuals - inSITE on the Islamic State - inSITE on Al Qaeda - inSITE on Western Jihadists - inSITE on HTS - inSITE on Terrorism and Technology - Terrorism & Finance - Energy & Critical Infrastructure - SOURCEFEED: Combatting Terrorist Exploitation of Online Technologies - Customized Services Read more on www.siteintelgroup.com

SITE Intelligence Group A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

SIG

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

site-intelligence-group

Website:

http://ent.siteintelgroup.com

Employees number:

2

Number of followers:

9,982

NAICS:

5616

Industry Type:

Security and Investigations

Homepage:

siteintelgroup.com

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

SIT_9603522

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreSIG Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 550 and 599

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/site-intelligence-group.jpeg
SIG Security and Investigations
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreSIG Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/site-intelligence-group.jpeg
SIG Security and Investigations
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

SITE Intelligence Group

Very Poor
Current Score
583
Ca (Very Poor)
01000
2 incidents
-89.5 avg impact

Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.

DECEMBER 2025
583
NOVEMBER 2025
693
Ransomware
19 Nov 2025 • Unspecified Enterprise (Targeted by Kraken Ransomware)
Kraken Ransomware Campaign with Benchmark-Driven Encryption

The Kraken ransomware campaign executed a sophisticated attack by first benchmarking system performance to optimize encryption speed and damage. Before encryption, it deleted shadow copies, cleared the Recycle Bin, and disabled backup services across Windows, Linux, and ESXi systems to prevent recovery. The malware targeted critical enterprise assets, including SQL databases, network shares, local drives, and Hyper-V/ESXi virtual machines, halting active VMs to unlock disks for encryption. Post-encryption, it wiped logs, shell history, and the binary itself, leaving files with a **.zpsc** extension and a ransom note (**readme_you_ws_hacked.txt**) demanding **$1 million in Bitcoin**. Attackers gained initial access via exposed **vulnerable SMB services**, harvested admin credentials, and re-entered using **Remote Desktop**. Persistence was maintained through **Cloudflare tunnels**, while **SSHFS** enabled lateral movement and data exfiltration. The attack disrupted operations by encrypting core systems, crippling virtualized environments, and potentially exposing sensitive data. The group, linked to the defunct **HelloKitty ransomware**, also launched an underground forum (**The Last Haven Board**) to coordinate cybercriminal activities. The incident highlights severe operational and financial risks, with potential long-term reputational damage and regulatory scrutiny due to compromised credentials, disabled backups, and encrypted critical infrastructure.

582
critical -111
SIT4562145111925
Incident Details -
Type
ransomware data encryption credential harvesting data exfiltration
Attack Vector
exploiting vulnerable SMB services harvesting administrator credentials Remote Desktop (RDP) re-entry Cloudflare tunnels for persistence SSHFS for lateral movement
Vulnerability Exploited
exposed SMB services weak or stolen credentials
Motivation
financial gain disruption data theft
Impact
Windows systems Linux systems ESXi systems SQL databases network shares local drives Hyper-V virtual machines file encryption (.zpsc extension) deletion of shadow copies/backups termination of virtual machines log clearing evidence elimination
Response
Cisco Talos (research/analysis) log clearing binary deletion evidence elimination (by attackers) ransom note deployment
Data Breach
enterprise data SQL databases virtual machine disks network shares local files
Lessons Learned
Limit exposure of internet-facing services (e.g., SMB). Enforce strong authentication and access controls. Maintain updated backups and test restoration processes. Monitor for unusual activity (e.g., benchmarking tests, credential harvesting). Segment networks to limit lateral movement. Patch vulnerabilities promptly to prevent exploitation.
Recommendations
Deploy strong ransomware protection (e.g., behavioral detection, endpoint security). Ensure backups are immutable and offline. Implement network segmentation to isolate critical systems. Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for remote access. Regularly audit and rotate credentials. Monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) associated with Kraken. Restrict internet-facing services like RDP and SMB. Update antivirus/anti-malware solutions and conduct regular scans.
Investigation Status
['Ongoing (public IoCs documented by Cisco Talos)']
Initial Access Broker
vulnerable SMB services stolen administrator credentials Cloudflare tunnels SSHFS for lateral movement SQL databases virtual machines (Hyper-V, ESXi) network shares
Post Incident Analysis
Exposed SMB services with weak credentials. Lack of network segmentation allowing lateral movement. Insufficient monitoring for benchmarking or pre-encryption activities. Inadequate backup protection (shadow copies/Recycle Bin deleted). Isolate and patch exposed services. Implement credential hygiene and MFA. Deploy behavioral-based detection for ransomware activities. Enhance logging and monitoring for unusual processes (e.g., test file encryption). Secure backups with immutability and air-gapping.
References
Blog URL Source URL
OCTOBER 2025
692
SEPTEMBER 2025
691
AUGUST 2025
690
JULY 2025
688
JUNE 2025
755
Breach
27 Jun 2025 • **Unspecified (General Consumer Data Breach Context)**
None

The article discusses a **large-scale data breach** exposing **consumers' sensitive personal information**, including financial data (e.g., bank statements, credit card details), government-issued IDs (e.g., Social Security numbers, driver’s licenses), and biometric data (e.g., Face ID vulnerabilities). The breach stems from **hackers stealing information from company servers**, **employee mishandling of data**, or **accidental exposure of private records**. Affected individuals face risks of **identity theft, fraudulent account openings, and financial losses**, with children’s data also being targeted. The breach’s magnitude suggests systemic vulnerabilities, potentially involving **phishing scams, malware, or spyware** to compromise passwords and devices. Victims are advised to freeze credit, enable two-factor authentication, and monitor transactions, indicating the breach’s severity extends beyond immediate financial harm to long-term reputational and operational damage for the implicated organization(s). The lack of a specific company name implies a **broad, industry-wide pattern** of high-impact consumer data leaks.

687
critical -68
SIT2741927100525
Incident Details -
Type
Data Breach (Hacking) Insider Threat (Employee Mishandling) Accidental Exposure Credential Theft (Phishing/Malware)
Attack Vector
Server Exploitation Insider Threat Accidental Disclosure Phishing Malware/Spyware Device Theft
Motivation
Financial Gain Identity Theft Fraud
Impact
Financial Loss: Potential (varies per individual; includes unauthorized transactions, identity theft, and credit damage) Personally Identifiable Information (PII) Financial Data (e.g., banking passwords) Credit History Child Identity Data (if applicable) Customer Complaints: Likely (due to exposed data and fraud risks) Brand Reputation Impact: High (erodes consumer trust in affected organizations) Legal Liabilities: Potential (state breach notification laws may impose penalties or require credit monitoring services for victims) Identity Theft Risk: High Payment Information Risk: High (if financial data or passwords are compromised)
Data Breach
PII (e.g., names, SSNs, birth certificates) Financial Data (e.g., banking credentials) Credit Information Child Identity Data Sensitivity Of Data: High (includes financial and identity-sensitive information) Data Exfiltration: Likely (for hacking/insider cases)
Regulatory Compliance
Regulations Violated: State Breach Notification Laws (varies by jurisdiction) Legal Actions: Potential (consumer benefits like credit monitoring may be mandated) Regulatory Notifications: Required (per state laws)
Lessons Learned
Consumers must proactively monitor credit and financial accounts post-breach. Credit freezes and fraud alerts are critical tools to mitigate identity theft risks. Password hygiene (e.g., frequent changes, 2FA) reduces exposure from credential theft. Biometric authentication alone is insufficient due to AI-driven spoofing risks. State laws provide some recourse, but individual vigilance remains essential.
Recommendations
Freeze credit at all three bureaus (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion). Place a fraud alert if credit freeze isn’t feasible. Change passwords for critical accounts (banking, email) and enable 2FA. Use password managers to generate and store complex, unique passwords. Monitor credit reports weekly via AnnualCreditReport.com. Review credit card statements for unauthorized charges; dispute suspicious activity. Sign up for transaction alerts (text/email) from credit issuers. Freeze a child’s credit if their data is exposed (requires certified mail documentation). Understand state breach notification laws and mandated consumer benefits (e.g., credit monitoring).
Customer Advisories
Freeze credit immediately to prevent new account fraud. Use fraud alerts as a temporary alternative if credit access is needed. Enable 2FA and update passwords for all critical accounts. Monitor credit reports and card statements for signs of fraud. Leverage state-mandated benefits (e.g., credit monitoring) if offered post-breach.
Initial Access Broker
Compromised Company Servers Insider Access (Employees) Phishing/Malware (Consumer Devices) Stolen Personal Devices Financial Data PII (SSNs, Birth Certificates) Credit Histories Data Sold On Dark Web: Likely (for hacked or insider-stolen data)
Post Incident Analysis
Inadequate server security (for hacking cases) Lack of insider threat monitoring Human error (accidental exposure) Poor consumer password hygiene Susceptibility to phishing/malware
References
Blog URL Source URL
MAY 2025
755
APRIL 2025
755
MARCH 2025
755
FEBRUARY 2025
755
JANUARY 2025
755

Frequently Asked Questions

According to Rankiteo, the current A.I.-based Cyber Score for SITE Intelligence Group is 583, which corresponds to a Very Poor rating.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for November 2025 was 693.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for October 2025 was 692.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for September 2025 was 691.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for August 2025 was 690.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for July 2025 was 688.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for June 2025 was 755.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for May 2025 was 755.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for April 2025 was 755.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for March 2025 was 755.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for February 2025 was 755.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for January 2025 was 755.

Over the past 12 months, the average per-incident point impact on SITE Intelligence Group’s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score has been -89.5 points.

You can access SITE Intelligence Group’s cyber incident details on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/site-intelligence-group.

You can find the summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: Rankiteo Algorithm.

You can view SITE Intelligence Group’s profile page on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/site-intelligence-group.

With scores of 18.5/20 from OpenAI ChatGPT, 20/20 from Mistral AI, and 17/20 from Claude AI, the A.I. Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology is validated as a market leader.