Comparison Overview
Sindus ANDRITZ

Sindus ANDRITZ
Avenida Amazonas, 576, Porto Alegre, RS, 90240541 , BR
Last Update: 07/03/2026
A Sindus ANDRITZ é uma empresa do Grupo ANDRITZ, onde atuam equipes das divisões Maintenance & Performance, ANDRITZ Automation e Metris Technology, além do suporte a outras divisões da companhia. Prestamos serviços baseados em inovação e no desenvolvimento de relações d...

ibex
1717 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 825, Washington, District of Columbia, US, 20006
Last Update: 02/04/2026
ibex delivers innovative business process outsourcing (BPO), smart digital marketing, online acquisition technology, and end-to-end customer engagement solutions to help companies acquire, engage and retain valuable customers. Today, ibex operates a global CX delivery c...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sindus ANDRITZ







ibex






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Outsourcing/Offshoring Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sindus ANDRITZ in 2026.
Incidents vs Outsourcing/Offshoring Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ibex in 2026.
Incident History - Sindus ANDRITZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sindus ANDRITZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ibex (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ibex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sindus ANDRITZ

ibex
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.