Comparison Overview
Simmons Bank
Simmons Bank
501 Main Street, Pine Bluff, 71601, US
Last Update: 29/03/2026
We were founded as a community bank. More than 100 years later, we still act like one. For over a century, we’ve worked hard to help make our customers’ dreams come true – dreams like buying a home, starting a business or simply having the ability to manage your money ...
ING Nederland
Amsterdam Zuidoost, 1102 CT Netherlands, Amsterdam Zuidoost, 1102 CT, NL
Last Update: 29/03/2026
ING ING is a global bank with a strong European base. With 14,500 employees in the Netherlands, we’re one of the biggest employers of the country. Our research tells us that we stand out here because of our great working culture, competitive benefits, and interesting wo...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Simmons Bank
ING Nederland
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Simmons Bank in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ING Nederland in 2026.
Incident History - Simmons Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Simmons Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ING Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ING Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Simmons Bank
ING Nederland
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.