Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MEDSHI1775701489)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Shine Aviation Services's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Shine Aviation Services Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Shine Aviation Services breach identified under incident ID MEDSHI1775701489.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Shine Aviation Services's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/shineaviation, the number of followers: 685, the industry type: Airlines and Aviation and the number of employees: 19 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 750 and after the incident was 594 with a difference of -156 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Shine Aviation Services and their customers.
On 04 April 2025, Shine Aviation disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Anubis Ransomware Group Targets Shine Aviation in 57GB Data Breach".
On 4 April, the Anubis ransomware operation listed Shine Aviation, a Western Australia-based aviation services provider, on its darknet leak site, claiming to have exfiltrated 57GB of data over 68,000 files.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 57GB (68,000 files), with nearly 68,000 files records at risk.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how Under investigation.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating network access credentials, corporate system logins stolen and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating anubis ransomware group listed Shine Aviation on darknet leak site. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating network access credentials, corporate system logins compromised and Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating corporate system logins exfiltrated (57GB data breach). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 57GB of data (68,000 files) exfiltrated including flight details and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating aircraft/flight details, employee security card scans stolen. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 57GB data exfiltrated; Anubis published partial proof and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data posted on darknet leak site as extortion tactic. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating anubis ransomware group (implied encryption for extortion) and Defacement (T1491) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating public shaming via darknet leak site (9/11 framing). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating used stolen corporate logins to evade detection and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating anubis group’s organized extortion tactics. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Shine Aviation Services Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/shineaviation/incident/MEDSHI1775701489
- Shine Aviation Services CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/shineaviation
- Shine Aviation Services Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/medshi1775701489-pound-road-medical-centre-shine-aviation-ransomware-april-2026/
- Shine Aviation Services CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/shineaviation/history
- Shine Aviation Services CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.cyberdaily.au/security/13437-exclusive-anubis-ransomware-gang-claims-hack-of-wa-based-shine-aviation
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf