Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SHA1786568202)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Shared Health's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Shared Health Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Shared Health breach identified under incident ID SHA1786568202.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Shared Health's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sharedhealth, the number of followers: 1248, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 206 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 671 and after the incident was 534 with a difference of -137 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Shared Health and their customers.
Health Sciences Centre (HSC) Winnipeg recently reported "Health Sciences Centre Winnipeg Hit by Ransomware Attack Targeting Facility Systems", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
The Health Sciences Centre (HSC) Winnipeg has confirmed a ransomware attack disrupting certain facility maintenance systems, including HVAC and door access controls.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting facility maintenance systems (HVAC, door access controls).
In response, and began remediation that includes working to restore affected operations securely, and stakeholders are being briefed through urging those requiring medical attention to proceed as usual; maintaining care continuity.
The case underscores how active review, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering urging those requiring medical attention to proceed as usual.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack disrupting certain facility maintenance systems and External Remote Services (T1133) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating attack targeting facility maintenance systems (HVAC, door access controls). Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attacks involve encrypting files. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including files encrypted (ransomware), and data encryption such as yes and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating disruption to facility maintenance systems (HVAC, door access controls). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack; origin and scope under investigation and Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion (T1497) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating third-party cybersecurity experts engaged for investigation. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating facility maintenance systems (HVAC, door access controls) affected. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Shared Health Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/sharedhealth/incident/SHA1786568202
- Shared Health CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/sharedhealth
- Shared Health Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/sha1786568202-shared-health-ransomware-august-2026/
- Shared Health CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/sharedhealth/history
- Shared Health CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.chrisd.ca/2026/08/10/health-sciences-centre-winnipeg-ransomware-incident/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf