Shannon-aerospace vs Klm - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Comparison Overview

Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace

N/A

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

http://www.shannonaerospace.com

752/1000Fair

LTSL, a subsidiary of Lufthansa Technik AG, specialising in the provision of Base Maintenance services on Boeing 737, 757 & 767, Airbus A319, A320 & A321 aircraft to the world’s airline industry. We also offer a portfolio of other expert services such as aircraft paint...

NAICS:481

NAICS Definition:Air Transportation

Employees:203

Subsidiaries:49

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

Amsterdamseweg 55, Amstelveen, 1182 GP, NL

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Between 700 and 749

http://klmf.ly/R05uLo

731/1000Moderate

Welcome to our LinkedIn page! To learn how we can assist you, please check: http://klmf.ly/ContactCentre. KLM was founded in 1919 and is the oldest airline in the world. With a vast network of European and intercontinental destinations, KLM can offer direct flights to...

NAICS:481

NAICS Definition:Air Transportation

Employees:22,827

Subsidiaries:3

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KLM Royal Dutch Airlines in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

Incidents

🔒 Incident : Breach

KLM304080925

🔒 Incident : Breach

KLM2289123

FAQ

Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace or KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace or KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ?

Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-76929

SUMMARY

Pcapng file parser crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76928

SUMMARY

X.509IF protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76927

SUMMARY

H.245 protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76926

SUMMARY

BUSMASTER file parser abnormal exit in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 3.1

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

1.4

EXPLOITABILITY

1.6

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76924

SUMMARY

Kerberos protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 5.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

1.8

REFERENCES