Comparison Overview
Sedgwick

Sedgwick
US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Sedgwick is the world’s leading risk and claims administration partner, helping clients thrive by navigating the unexpected. The company’s expertise, combined with the most advanced AI-enabled technology available, sets the standard for solutions in claims administratio...

Aflac
1932 Wynnton Rd, Columbus, 31999, US
Last Update: 13/08/2026
Over 50 Million people worldwide have chosen Aflac because of our commitment to providing customers with the confidence that comes from knowing they have assistance in being prepared for whatever life may bring. With Aflac, whether you're a large business or a small o...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sedgwick







Aflac






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sedgwick in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
Aflac has 191.26% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Sedgwick (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sedgwick cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Aflac (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aflac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sedgwick

Aflac
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Glance through 32.0.0, the /v2/tasks API accepts type=import tasks that bypass import_filtering_opts, allowing an admin to fetch internal URLs from the Glance service network (aka SSRF), as long as https:// or http:// is used. This API has been available only to admins since Xena, and it has been deprecated for several releases.
SPIP before 4.4.20 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, as exploited in the wild in August 2026. This is related to incorrect identification of <?php blocks, and var_export's mishandling of certain cases such as presence of a '<' character.
Path traversal in apport-unpack in Canonical Apport before 2.36.0, 2.34.2, and 2.28.4 on Linux allows an attacker to create or overwrite arbitrary files with the privileges of the executing user via an attacker controlled key names in crash report files.
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill PDMLink and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data.
A critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data.