Comparison Overview
Scottish Widows Workplace Pensions
Scottish Widows Workplace Pensions
London, City of London, GB
Last Update: 19/02/2026
At Scottish Widows, we build long term relationships with employers and our relationship-led service teams can help employers and their employees; from setting up schemes to supporting the on-going management of workplace pension schemes. We can provide contract-based ...
S&P Global
55 Water Street, New York, 10041, US
Last Update: 09/09/2026
S&P Global (NYSE: SPGI) enables businesses, governments, and individuals with trusted data, expertise and technology to make decisions with conviction. We are Advancing Essential Intelligence through world-leading benchmarks, data, and insights that customers need in or...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Scottish Widows Workplace Pensions
S&P Global
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Scottish Widows Workplace Pensions in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
S&P Global has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Scottish Widows Workplace Pensions (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Scottish Widows Workplace Pensions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - S&P Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)
S&P Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Scottish Widows Workplace Pensions
S&P Global
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.