Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Department for Science, Innovation and TechnologyDepartment for Science, Innovation and Technology
VS
UK Home OfficeUK Home Office
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

22-26 Whitehall, London, SW1A 2EG, GB

Last Update: 27/03/2026

View Profile

Follow this profile to stay up-to-date with our mission: improving people's lives by maximising the potential of science & technology.

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:2,609
Subsidiaries:69
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UK Home Office

UK Home Office

2 Marsham Street, London, GB, SW1P 4DF

Last Update: 30/04/2026

View Profile

At the Home Office, we help to ensure that the country is safe and secure. We’ve been looking after UK citizens since 1782. We are responsible for: - working on the problems caused by illegal drug use - shaping the alcohol strategy, policy and licensing conditions - k...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,485
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UK Home Office

UK Home Office

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Department for Science, Innovation and Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UK Home Office in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department for Science, Innovation and Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UK Home Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UK Home Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UK Home Office

UK Home Office

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UK-1777581082
🔒 Incident : Breach
UK-0694206092025

FAQ

Between Department for Science, Innovation and Technology company and UK Home Office company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Department for Science, Innovation and Technology company and UK Home Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Department for Science, Innovation and Technology company and UK Home Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Department for Science, Innovation and Technology company and UK Home Office company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Department for Science, Innovation and Technology company and UK Home Office company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Department for Science, Innovation and Technology company and UK Home Office company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Department for Science, Innovation and Technology company and UK Home Office company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Department for Science, Innovation and Technology company and UK Home Office company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Department for Science, Innovation and Technology company and UK Home Office company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Department for Science, Innovation and Technology company and UK Home Office company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Department for Science, Innovation and Technology company and UK Home Office company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Department for Science, Innovation and Technology and UK Home Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Department for Science, Innovation and Technology and UK Home Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Department for Science, Innovation and Technology or UK Home Office ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Department for Science, Innovation and Technology or UK Home Office ?
Between Department for Science, Innovation and Technology and UK Home Office, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Department for Science, Innovation and Technology and UK Home Office, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9