Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Schneider Electric » KORKORSCH1767123879

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (KORKORSCH1767123879)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-119
Company Score Before Incident686 / 1000
Company Score After Incident567 / 1000
Company LinkView Schneider Electric Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERKORKORSCH1767123879
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORSupply-Chain Attack, Exploitation of Vulnerability (CVE-2025-61882)
DATA EXPOSED500 GB of archives
INCIDENT DATE20/11/2025
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Schneider Electric's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Schneider Electric Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Schneider Electric breach identified under incident ID KORKORSCH1767123879.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Schneider Electric's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/schneider-electric, the number of followers: 5270476, the industry type: Automation Machinery Manufacturing and the number of employees: 86836 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 686 and after the incident was 567 with a difference of -119 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Schneider Electric and their customers.

On 21 November 2025, Korean Air disclosed Data Breach, Ransomware issues under the banner "Korean Air Data Breach via KC&D Supply-Chain Attack".

Korean Air lost sensitive data on ~30,000 employees in a supply-chain breach involving Korean Air Catering & Duty-Free (KC&D).

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS), and exposing 500 GB of archives, with nearly 30,000 records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including supply-chain attack on its catering and duty-free subsidiary, and exploitation of Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS) vulnerability (CVE-2025-61882) and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exploited a critical vulnerability (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Network Device Configuration (T1552.008) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exposed full names and bank account numbers (implied access to sensitive data stores). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including leaked nearly 500 GB of archives, and data exfiltration such as Yes and Data Transfer Size Limits (T1030) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 500 GB of archives stolen and leaked. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating type such as Ransomware (implied encryption, though not explicitly confirmed) and Financial Theft (T1657) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including exposed bank account numbers, and high risk of identity theft and financial fraud. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (95%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Network Device Configuration (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (90%)
Data Transfer Size Limits (80%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (50%)
Financial Theft (80%)

Sources & References