Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Scania ArgentinaScania Argentina
VS
Bridgestone AmericasBridgestone Americas
Scania Argentina

Scania Argentina

Piedrabuena 5400, Grand Bourg, 1615, AR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Scania es proveedor líder mundial de soluciones de transporte. Junto con nuestros socios y clientes, estamos impulsando el cambio hacia un sistema de transporte sustentable. Fundada en 1891, Scania opera en más de 100 países y cuenta con 57.000 colaboradores. La produ...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:753
Subsidiaries:65
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bridgestone Americas

Bridgestone Americas

200 4th Ave S, Nashville, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
737/1000Moderate

Bridgestone Americas, Inc. (BSAM), headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee, and Bridgestone Europe, Middle East and Africa (BSEMEA), headquartered in Brussels, Belgium, operate collectively as a “Bridgestone West” strategic region. This region services the strategic busin...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:19,085
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Scania Argentina

Scania Argentina

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bridgestone Americas

Bridgestone Americas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scania Argentina in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bridgestone Americas in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Scania Argentina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scania Argentina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bridgestone Americas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bridgestone Americas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Scania Argentina

Scania Argentina

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bridgestone Americas

Bridgestone Americas

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BRI1437922
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BRI1454214092325
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BRI23292322

FAQ

Between Scania Argentina company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Scania Argentina company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Scania Argentina company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Scania Argentina company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Scania Argentina company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Scania Argentina company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Scania Argentina company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Scania Argentina company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Scania Argentina company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Scania Argentina company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Scania Argentina company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Scania Argentina and Bridgestone Americas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Scania Argentina and Bridgestone Americas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Scania Argentina or Bridgestone Americas ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Scania Argentina or Bridgestone Americas ?
Between Scania Argentina and Bridgestone Americas, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Scania Argentina and Bridgestone Americas, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9