Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Scalable CapitalScalable Capital
VS
Principal Financial GroupPrincipal Financial Group
Scalable Capital

Scalable Capital

Seitzstraße 8e, München, 80538, DE

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.scalable.capital
736/1000Moderate

Scalable Capital is a leading digital banking and investment platform with a full banking licence, enabling people in Europe to take control of their finances. The company was founded in 2014 and has offices in Munich, Berlin, Vienna, Milan and London. For private ind...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:791
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Principal Financial Group

Principal Financial Group

711 High St., Des Moines, Iowa, US, 50309

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.principal.com
706/1000Moderate

Principal Financial Group® is dedicated to improving the wealth and well-being of people and businesses around the world—helping more than 62M customers plan, protect, invest, and retire as of December 31, 2023. Along the way, we commit to supporting the communities whe...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:23,891
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Scalable Capital

Scalable Capital

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Principal Financial Group

Principal Financial Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scalable Capital in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Principal Financial Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Scalable Capital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scalable Capital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Principal Financial Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Principal Financial Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Scalable Capital

Scalable Capital

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SCA0408523
Principal Financial Group

Principal Financial Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRI131072625
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRI956091725
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRI1009091725

FAQ

Between Scalable Capital company and Principal Financial Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Scalable Capital company and Principal Financial Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Scalable Capital company and Principal Financial Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Scalable Capital company and Principal Financial Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Scalable Capital company and Principal Financial Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Scalable Capital company and Principal Financial Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Scalable Capital company and Principal Financial Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Scalable Capital company and Principal Financial Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Scalable Capital company and Principal Financial Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Scalable Capital company and Principal Financial Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Scalable Capital company and Principal Financial Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Scalable Capital and Principal Financial Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Scalable Capital and Principal Financial Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Scalable Capital or Principal Financial Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Scalable Capital or Principal Financial Group ?
Between Scalable Capital and Principal Financial Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Scalable Capital and Principal Financial Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA