Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Argentina SBA - Small Business Administration » SBA1772814835

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SBA1772814835)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-55
Company Score Before Incident754 / 1000
Company Score After Incident699 / 1000
Company LinkView Argentina SBA - Small Business Administration Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERSBA1772814835
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORAI-driven attacks, supply_chain_exploitation, account_takeover, fraudulent_account_creation
DATA EXPOSED278.8 million victims
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2024
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Argentina SBA - Small Business Administration's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Argentina SBA - Small Business Administration Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Argentina SBA - Small Business Administration breach identified under incident ID SBA1772814835.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Argentina SBA - Small Business Administration's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sba---small-business-administration, the number of followers: 458, the industry type: Financial Services and the number of employees: 39 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 754 and after the incident was 699 with a difference of -55 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Argentina SBA - Small Business Administration and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "2025 Record-Breaking Data Breaches and Shift in Attacker Tactics", has drawn attention.

The U.S.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 278.8 million victims, with nearly 278.8 million records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of cleanup_costs_passed_to_consumers.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through only_30%_of_companies_disclosed_breach_details.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Traditional security measures are no longer sufficient. Organizations must adopt AI-driven threat analysis and real-time response capabilities. The window for breach response has tightened to mere hours, and recommending next steps like Adopt AI-driven threat analysis and real-time response capabilities, Improve transparency in breach disclosures and Enhance cybersecurity resources for SMEs, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering 75% of consumers demand clearer breach disclosures, including specifics on compromised data.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating supply chain attacks doubled since 2021, now accounting for 30% of all breaches, Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating account takeovers and fraudulent account creation via previously compromised data, and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating professional services firms exploited as gateways to their clients. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Compromise Accounts (T1586) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating attackers leveraging previously compromised data (PCD) for account takeovers and Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating aI-driven attacks repurposing compromised data for fraudulent account creation. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 278.8 million victims personally identifiable information compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating professional services firms targeted as gateways to client data. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data theft over encryption; 3,322 data compromises in 2025 and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating aI-driven attacks repurposing compromised data for new attacks. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating account takeovers and fraudulent account creation via compromised data and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating limited cybersecurity resources in SMEs. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attacks continued their two-year decline and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating brand reputation impact such as negative consequences for 88% of consumers. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (90%)
Valid Accounts (80%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
Credential Access
Compromise Accounts (80%)
Brute Force (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (70%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (40%)
Defacement (30%)

Sources & References