Comparison Overview
SAS Retail Services

SAS Retail Services
7676 Forsyth Blvd, St Louis, 63105, US
Last Update: 07/04/2026
We’re here to make your impossible, #possible at retail. Any Store. Any Aisle. Any Service. Today, every day, team SAS Retail Services actualizes vision —for retailer and CPG partners across the U.S., Canada, and in Asia. As change agents in an industry of change, we ...

Bath & Body Works
Columbus, Ohio, US, 43068
Last Update: 14/09/2026
We were founded on a simple idea: to make the world a brighter, happier place through the power of fragrance. As we've grown, so has our purpose and today, we help the world live more fully through the power of fragrance. We’re a team that cares about our customers and...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

SAS Retail Services







Bath & Body Works






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SAS Retail Services in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bath & Body Works in 2026.
Incident History - SAS Retail Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SAS Retail Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Bath & Body Works (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bath & Body Works cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

SAS Retail Services

Bath & Body Works
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.