Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Olympique de Marseille » SAS1772123354

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SAS1772123354)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-86
Company Score Before Incident767 / 1000
Company Score After Incident681 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERSAS1772123354
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal information (names, addresses, order...
INCIDENT DATE25/02/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Olympique de Marseille's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Olympique de Marseille Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Olympique de Marseille breach identified under incident ID SAS1772123354.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Olympique de Marseille's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sasp-olympique-de-marseille, the number of followers: 149634, the industry type: Spectator Sports and the number of employees: 733 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 767 and after the incident was 681 with a difference of -86 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Olympique de Marseille and their customers.

Olympique de Marseille recently reported "Olympique de Marseille Cyberattack and Data Breach", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

French football club Olympique de Marseille confirmed a cyberattack after a threat actor claimed to have breached the club’s systems and stolen a database containing personal information on 400,000 individuals, including staff and supporters.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Drupal CMS, and exposing Personal information (names, addresses, order details, email addresses, phone numbers), Drupal CMS accounts, with nearly 400,000 individuals, 2,050 Drupal CMS accounts records at risk.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Swift containment by technical teams and external experts, and stakeholders are being briefed through Official statement to fans, advisory on phishing attempts.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Advisory to fans on potential phishing attempts.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including accessed 2,050 Drupal CMS accounts, and breached the club’s systems and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 34 linked to OM staff and 1,770 to contributors and moderators. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating accessed 2,050 Drupal CMS accounts and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating drupal CMS accounts compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating database containing personal information on 400,000 individuals and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating drupal CMS accounts accessed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating threat actor claimed to have breached the club’s systems and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating stolen data listed for sale on hacking forum. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on malware’s origin or extent of breach and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential phishing attempts advised to fans. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (70%)
Valid Accounts (80%)
Credential Access
Credentials from Password Stores (60%)
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References