Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » SAP » SAPJAG1773959105

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SAPJAG1773959105)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-15
Company Score Before Incident742 / 1000
Company Score After Incident727 / 1000
Company LinkView SAP Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERSAPJAG1773959105
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORVulnerability exploitation (SAP software)
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE24/09/2025
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of SAP's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts SAP Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the SAP breach identified under incident ID SAPJAG1773959105.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of SAP's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sap, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 138981 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 742 and after the incident was 727 with a difference of -15 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on SAP and their customers.

Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) recently reported "Jaguar Land Rover Hit by Costly Cyberattack as Insurance Gap Leaves It Exposed", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Jaguar Land Rover (JLR), the UK’s largest automaker, is grappling with the fallout of a severe cyberattack that has forced three factories offline until at least October 1.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Three factories offline, plus an estimated financial loss of £50 million ($68 million) per week.

In response, while recovery efforts such as Phased restart plan continue.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Highlights risks of gaps in cyber coverage and vulnerabilities in operational technology for manufacturers reliant on just-in-time production, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering UK industry minister Chris McDonald pledged support to stabilize JLR and its supply chain.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exploited a vulnerability in SAP software. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Service Stop (T1489) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating forced three factories offline until at least October 1 and Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating attack threatening the organizations existence. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sAP software vulnerability, supply chain disruption. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating scattered Spider group previously targeted British retailers. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (80%)
Impact
Service Stop (90%)
Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (70%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (60%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (50%)

Sources & References