Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » SAP Community » SAP1775665752

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SAP1775665752)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-104
Company Score Before Incident767 / 1000
Company Score After Incident663 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERSAP1775665752
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORExploitation of unpatched vulnerabilities, Perimeter assets exposed to the internet
DATA EXPOSEDTrue
INCIDENT DATE24/04/2025
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of SAP Community's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts SAP Community Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the SAP Community breach identified under incident ID SAP1775665752.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of SAP Community's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sap-community-official, the number of followers: 95737, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: None employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 767 and after the incident was 663 with a difference of -104 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on SAP Community and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Storm-1175 Hackers Exploit N-Day Vulnerabilities at Record Speed, Deploying Medusa Ransomware Globally", has drawn attention.

A cybercriminal group tracked as Storm-1175 is rapidly exploiting unpatched vulnerabilities to deploy Medusa ransomware, targeting perimeter assets exposed to the internet.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Critical infrastructure, schools, law firms, hospitals, and exposing True.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including exploited CVE-2025-31324, a flaw in SAP NetWeaver, and targeting perimeter assets systems directly exposed to the internet and Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including exploiting unpatched vulnerabilities in perimeter assets, and compromising networks within hours of a vulnerability’s public disclosure. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exploited CVE-2025-31324 in SAP NetWeaver to deploy Medusa ransomware and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating uses legitimate remote management tools like AnyDesk, ConnectWise ScreenConnect. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating leverages AnyDesk, ConnectWise ScreenConnect for undetected access. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exploits unpatched vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-31324) for initial access. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating disabling security defenses by manipulating antivirus exclusions (e.g.,adding C such as \ drive) and Masquerading (T1036) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating uses legitimate tools (AnyDesk, Rclone) to blend in with normal activity. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating leverages remote management tools (AnyDesk, ConnectWise) for lateral movement and Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating uses AnyDesk for undetected lateral movement. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating uses Rclone and Bandizip to exfiltrate data before deploying ransomware. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating uses Rclone to exfiltrate data before ransomware deployment and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed prior to encryption. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating deploys Medusa ransomware to encrypt data across entire systems and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware cripples critical infrastructure, preventing recovery. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (95%)
Exploitation of Remote Services (90%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (80%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter (70%)
Persistence
External Remote Services (80%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (70%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (90%)
Masquerading (80%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (85%)
Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (95%)
Inhibit System Recovery (70%)

Sources & References