Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Salesforce » SAL1786285485

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SAL1786285485)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact0
Company Score Before Incident100 / 1000
Company Score After Incident100 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERSAL1786285485
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORThird-party unauthorized access
DATA EXPOSEDPersonally identifiable information (PII) and...
INCIDENT DATE11/05/2026
STATUSCompleted (breach confirmed on June 8, 2026)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Salesforce's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Salesforce Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Salesforce breach identified under incident ID SAL1786285485.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Salesforce's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/salesforce, the number of followers: 6652548, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 85366 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 100 and after the incident was 100 with a difference of 0 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Salesforce and their customers.

On 07 August 2026, American Addiction Centers (AAC) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "American Addiction Centers Discloses Third-Party Salesforce Data Breach Affecting Sensitive Patient Information".

American Addiction Centers (AAC) has reported a data breach involving unauthorized access to its Salesforce environment by a third party, exposing personally identifiable and health-related information of individuals who contacted the organization.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Salesforce instance, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII) and health-related information.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification letters mailed to affected individuals, dedicated call center (1-888-650-3763), enrollment support (866-675-2006).

The case underscores how Completed (breach confirmed on June 8, 2026), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notification letters mailed to affected individuals with instructions for identity protection services enrollment.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its Salesforce environment by a third party and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating third-party unauthorized access to Salesforce environment. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its Salesforce environment and Cloud Instance Metadata API (T1552.005) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating salesforce environment misconfiguration/access control. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating accessed sensitive data stored in AAC’s Salesforce instance and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exposed data included names, contact details, SSNs, health conditions. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach involving unauthorized access to Salesforce environment and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating third-party unauthorized access to Salesforce environment. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Application Access Token (T1550.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to Salesforce environment via third party and Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating salesforce environment misconfiguration/access control exploited. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data misuse, but sensitive data exposed and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential reputational damage due to sensitive data exposure. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (80%)
Trusted Relationship (70%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (70%)
Cloud Instance Metadata API (60%)
Collection
Data from Information Repositories (90%)
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Defense Evasion
Application Access Token (70%)
Cloud Accounts (80%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Stored Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References