Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (AQUUSEAMASALCIS1775046662)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Salesforce's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Salesforce Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Salesforce breach identified under incident ID AQUUSEAMASALCIS1775046662.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Salesforce's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/salesforce, the number of followers: 6652548, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 85366 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 100 and after the incident was 100 with a difference of 0 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Salesforce and their customers.
Cisco recently reported "Cisco Hit by Major Cyberattack Linked to Supply Chain Breach", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
Cisco is responding to a significant cybersecurity incident after threat actors breached its internal development networks, stealing sensitive source code and corporate data.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Dozens of devices (lab workstations, developer systems, build environments), and exposing AWS keys, over 300 private GitHub repositories (unreleased product source code, AI Assistants, AI Defense technologies, corporate client data), with nearly Over 300 private GitHub repositories records at risk.
In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Isolated affected systems, wiped compromised machines, mass credential reset, and stakeholders are being briefed through No public statement issued yet.
The case underscores how Ongoing.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including breach originated from a supply chain attack involving Trivy, and exploited a malicious GitHub Action plugin tied to the Trivy compromise and Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools (T1195.001) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including malicious GitHub Action plugin tied to the Trivy compromise, and trivy, a widely used vulnerability scanner. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious Image (T1204.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating malicious GitHub Action plugin allowed attackers to infiltrate build environments. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating stole credentials...AWS keys, which were used to perform unauthorized actions and Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating stole credentials and infiltrate Cisco’s build environments. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating compromised dozens of devices, including lab workstations and developer systems. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Code Repositories (T1213.003) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating over 300 private GitHub repositories...unreleased product source code and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating stole sensitive source code and corporate data from internal networks. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data breach...ShinyHunters has taken credit for the data theft and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating aWS keys...used to perform unauthorized actions in Cisco’s cloud accounts. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Modify Cloud Compute Infrastructure (T1578) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating aWS keys...used to perform unauthorized actions in Cisco’s cloud accounts and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating stole credentials...AWS keys, which were used to perform unauthorized actions. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating aWS keys...used to perform unauthorized actions in Cisco’s cloud accounts and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating wiping compromised machines as part of containment. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Salesforce Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/salesforce/incident/AQUUSEAMASALCIS1775046662
- Salesforce CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/salesforce
- Salesforce Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/aquuseamasalcis1775046662-trivy-cisco-salesforce-aws-aura-vulnerability-april-2026/
- Salesforce CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/salesforce/history
- Salesforce CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://gbhackers.com/cisco-data-leak-as-shinyhunters-claims-responsibility/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf