Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Saint-Gobain » CISSAI1773859283

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CISSAI1773859283)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-3
Company Score Before Incident696 / 1000
Company Score After Incident693 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERCISSAI1773859283
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORZero-day vulnerability exploitation
DATA EXPOSED43 GB (Saint Paul, Minnesota...
INCIDENT DATE25/01/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Saint-Gobain's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Saint-Gobain Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Saint-Gobain breach identified under incident ID CISSAI1773859283.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Saint-Gobain's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/saint-gobain, the number of followers: 1125428, the industry type: Wholesale Building Materials and the number of employees: 36161 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 696 and after the incident was 693 with a difference of -3 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Saint-Gobain and their customers.

On 04 March 2026, Davita disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Interlock Ransomware Exploited Zero-Day in Cisco Firewall Before Patch".

Ransomware group Interlock exploited a maximum-severity zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2026-20131) in Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center more than a month before the vendor released a patch.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center, hospital systems, government entities, and exposing 43 GB (Saint Paul, Minnesota incident).

In response, and began remediation that includes Cisco released patches on March 4, 2026.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Zero-day vulnerabilities can be exploited before patches are available, highlighting the need for proactive threat detection and redundant security measures, and recommending next steps like Apply Cisco patches immediately, monitor for unusual activity, implement network segmentation, and enhance incident response plans for ransomware attacks.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating exploited a maximum-severity zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2026-20131) in Cisco Secure Firewall. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell (T1059.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating powerShell script harvesting system details (OS, hardware, services, software), Command and Scripting Interpreter: JavaScript (T1059.007) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating custom remote access trojans (RATs) in JavaScript providing persistent access, Command and Scripting Interpreter: Java (T1059.005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating custom remote access trojans (RATs) in Java providing persistent access, and Command and Scripting Interpreter: Bash (T1059.004) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating bash script configuring Linux servers as reverse proxies, wiping logs. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Server Software Component: Web Shell (T1505.003) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating custom remote access trojans (RATs) in JavaScript/Java for persistent access, Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (T1543.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating rATs providing persistent access, command execution, file transfer, and Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder (T1547.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating memory-resident backdoors and lightweight network beacons for persistence. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating flaw allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java code as root. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal: Clear Command History (T1070.003) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating bash script wiping logs to evade detection, Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location (T1036.005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating legitimate tools like ConnectWise ScreenConnect, Volatility, and Certify, and Process Injection: Process Hollowing (T1055.012) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating memory-resident backdoors to evade detection. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating powerShell script harvesting system details including RDP logs. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified System Information Discovery (T1082) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating powerShell script harvesting OS, hardware, services, software, storage, VM inventory, File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating powerShell script harvesting user files, and Remote System Discovery (T1018) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating rATs with SOCKS5 proxy capabilities for network discovery. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating rDP logs harvested, ConnectWise ScreenConnect used for remote access and Proxy: External Proxy (T1090.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating bash script configuring Linux servers as reverse proxies. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating powerShell script harvesting user files, browser data, and system details and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 43 GB data breach (Saint Paul, Minnesota incident). Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Proxy: External Proxy (T1090.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating bash script configuring Linux servers as reverse proxies, Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating rATs providing command execution and file transfer capabilities, and Encrypted Channel: Asymmetric Cryptography (T1573.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating lightweight network beacons for C2 communication. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 43 GB data breach (Saint Paul, Minnesota incident), data exfiltration confirmed. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware encryption confirmed, Interlock ransomware strain used, Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransom notes threatening regulatory exposure and data leaks, and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating disrupted chemotherapy sessions, pre-surgery appointments, critical services. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (95%)
Execution
Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell (90%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter: JavaScript (90%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter: Java (90%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter: Bash (90%)
Persistence
Server Software Component: Web Shell (80%)
Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (70%)
Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder (70%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (95%)
Defense Evasion
Indicator Removal: Clear Command History (90%)
Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location (80%)
Process Injection: Process Hollowing (70%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (70%)
Discovery
System Information Discovery (90%)
File and Directory Discovery (90%)
Remote System Discovery (80%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (80%)
Proxy: External Proxy (80%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Command and Control
Proxy: External Proxy (90%)
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (80%)
Encrypted Channel: Asymmetric Cryptography (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (95%)
Defacement: Internal Defacement (70%)
Inhibit System Recovery (80%)

Sources & References