What is the official website of S.C. SWIDERSKI ?

The official website of S.C. SWIDERSKI is http://www.scswiderski.com.

What is S.C. SWIDERSKI's cybersecurity risk score?

S.C. SWIDERSKI has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 755 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has S.C. SWIDERSKI experienced?

According to Rankiteo, S.C. SWIDERSKI currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has S.C. SWIDERSKI been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, S.C. SWIDERSKI has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does S.C. SWIDERSKI have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, S.C. SWIDERSKI is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does S.C. SWIDERSKI have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, S.C. SWIDERSKI does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does S.C. SWIDERSKI comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, S.C. SWIDERSKI is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does S.C. SWIDERSKI have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, S.C. SWIDERSKI does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does S.C. SWIDERSKI comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, S.C. SWIDERSKI is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does S.C. SWIDERSKI have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,S.C. SWIDERSKI is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does S.C. SWIDERSKI operate in ?

S.C. SWIDERSKI operates primarily in the Housing and Community Development industry.

How many employees does S.C. SWIDERSKI have ?

S.C. SWIDERSKI employs approximately 85 people worldwide.

Does S.C. SWIDERSKI own any subsidiaries ?

S.C. SWIDERSKI presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does S.C. SWIDERSKI have ?

S.C. SWIDERSKI's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 1,371 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for S.C. SWIDERSKI ?

S.C. SWIDERSKI is classified under the NAICS code 925, which corresponds to Administration of Housing Programs, Urban Planning, and Community Development.

Does S.C. SWIDERSKI have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, S.C. SWIDERSKI does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does S.C. SWIDERSKI have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, S.C. SWIDERSKI maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/s-c-swiderski.

How many cybersecurity incidents has S.C. SWIDERSKI experienced ?

As of June 6, 2026, Rankiteo reports that S.C. SWIDERSKI has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does S.C. SWIDERSKI have ?

S.C. SWIDERSKI has an estimated 102 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

S.C. SWIDERSKI

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

755

/1000

Fair

780

/1000

Fair

S.C. SWIDERSKI Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

scswiderski.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

S.C. Swiderski (SCS), founded in Mosinee, Wisconsin in 1992 is a fully integrated real estate development company. SCS supports the development, design, construction, management, and maintenance of its portfolio. SCS values quality, trust, integrity, community, and innovation in its people and processes. SCS is committed to continuous growth and enhancing the housing industry by concentrating on providing solutions to housing needs.

S.C. SWIDERSKI A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

S.C. SWIDERSKI

S.C. SWIDERSKI CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

S.C. SWIDERSKI Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for S.C. SWIDERSKI

Incidents vs Housing and Community Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for S.C. SWIDERSKI in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for S.C. SWIDERSKI in 2026.

Incident Types S.C. SWIDERSKI vs Housing and Community Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for S.C. SWIDERSKI in 2026.

Incident History - S.C. SWIDERSKI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

S.C. SWIDERSKI Subsidiaries

Parent Company

S.C. SWIDERSKI

Housing and Community Development

Website: http://www.scswiderski.com

Company Size: 85

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

S.C. SWIDERSKI Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

S.C. SWIDERSKI CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-7654

SUMMARY

The Admin Columns plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection leading to Remote Code Execution in versions up to and including 7.0.18. This is due to the use of `unserialize()` without an `allowed_classes` restriction in the `IdsToCollection::get_ids_from_string()` function, which processes attacker-controlled post meta values without proper validation. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with Contributor-level access and above to inject a serialized PHP object into a post's custom meta field and trigger arbitrary code execution by exploiting a bundled POP gadget chain, resulting in remote code execution as the web server user.

Published

Date2026-06-05

Updated

Date2026-06-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-7523

SUMMARY

The Alba Board plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.3. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to access arbitrary private alba_card post data, including title, description, assignee, due date, tags, and comments, that is intended to be restricted to Administrators and Editors. The handler is registered via the wp_ajax_nopriv_ hook and its nonce is exposed to all site visitors through wp_localize_script on pages containing the [alba_board] shortcode, making this exploitable by unauthenticated users who can access any such page.

Published

Date2026-06-05

Updated

Date2026-06-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 4.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-45409

SUMMARY

Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA) for Python provides support for Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA) and Unicode IDNA Compatibility Processing. In versions prior to 3.15, payloads such as `"\u0660" * N` or `"\u30fb" * N + "\u6f22"` utilize the `valid_contexto` function prior to length rejection, and for high values of `N` will take a long time to process. This is the same issue as CVE-2024-3651, however the original remediation in 2024 was not a complete fix. A specially crafted argument to the `idna.encode()` function could consume significant resources. This may lead to a denial-of-service. Starting in version 3.14, the function rejects long inputs as soon as practicable prior to any further processing to minimize resource consumption. In version 3.15, this approach was extended to lesser used alternate functions (i.e. per-label conversions and codec support). A workaround is available. Domain names cannot exceed 253 characters in length. If this length limit is enforced prior to passing the domain to the `idna.encode()` function, it should no longer consume significant resources. This is triggered by arbitrarily large inputs that would not occur in normal usage, but may be passed to the library assuming there is no preliminary input validation by the higher-level application.

Published

Date2026-06-05

Updated

Date2026-06-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/kjd/idna/security/advisories/GHSA-65pc-fj4g-8rjx

CVE-2026-11431

SUMMARY

A path traversal vulnerability exists in the Projects Service download endpoint shared by Altium Enterprise Server and Altium 365. An authenticated user can supply a crafted path parameter that bypasses validation, allowing arbitrary files (including entire directories returned as archives) to be read from the server filesystem. Because the readable files include service configuration and credential material, exploitation can be used to gather information enabling further compromise. The issue can be combined with CVE-2026-11424 to reach the cloud-side endpoint. On multi-tenant Altium 365 deployments, the readable configuration could have exposed credentials shared across services. Altium Enterprise Server is fixed in 8.1.1; the issue has been remediated in Altium 365 at the service level.

Published

Date2026-06-05

Updated

Date2026-06-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://www.altium.com/platform/security-compliance/security-advisories

CVE-2026-11429

SUMMARY

A path traversal vulnerability exists in the Git Service component shared by Altium Enterprise Server and Altium 365. The service accepts a sequence of post-clone file-manipulation operations that use user-supplied paths without validation, allowing an authenticated user with basic git access to move arbitrary files outside the intended repository area. This file-move primitive can be used to place attacker-controlled script content into directories where it is later executed by the service, resulting in remote code execution under the Git Service account. On multi-tenant Altium 365 deployments, this could have allowed access to data belonging to other tenants on the same infrastructure node. Altium Enterprise Server is fixed in 8.1.1; the issue has been remediated in Altium 365 at the service level.

Published

Date2026-06-05

Updated

Date2026-06-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://www.altium.com/platform/security-compliance/security-advisories

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…