Comparison Overview
Ryuk Labs

Ryuk Labs
Dubai, AE
Last Update: 21/04/2026
Ryuk Labs is a software development firm focused on building reliable, scalable and high-impact digital products across AI, Web3, and modern web technologies. From early-stage ideas to production-ready platforms, we help turn concepts into real, usable products. Our ex...

Rakuten
Rakuten Crimson House, Setagaya-ku, 158-0094, JP
Last Update: 30/05/2026
Rakuten Group, Inc. (TSE: 4755) is a global technology leader in services that empower individuals, communities, businesses and society. Founded in Tokyo in 1997 as an online marketplace, Rakuten has expanded to offer services in e-commerce, fintech, digital content and...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Ryuk Labs







Rakuten






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ryuk Labs in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Rakuten has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Ryuk Labs (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ryuk Labs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Rakuten (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Rakuten cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Ryuk Labs

Rakuten
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.