Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

RWJBarnabas Health Business DevelopmentRWJBarnabas Health Business Development
VS
UPMCUPMC
RWJBarnabas Health Business Development

RWJBarnabas Health Business Development

N/A

Last Update: 12/02/2026

View Profile

RWJBarnabas Health recognizes that establishing a comprehensive care network requires expanding patient access beyond the walls of the hospital. In furtherance of this mission, Business Development is committed to devising innovative alignment models in the outpatient s...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UPMC

UPMC

US Steel Tower, Pittsburgh, 15219, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.upmc.com
587/1000Very Poor

UPMC is a world-renowned, nonprofit health care provider and insurer committed to delivering exceptional, people-centered care and community services. Headquartered in Pittsburgh and affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Schools of the Health Sciences, UPMC is sh...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:42,506
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
RWJBarnabas Health Business Development

RWJBarnabas Health Business Development

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UPMC

UPMC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RWJBarnabas Health Business Development in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

UPMC has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - RWJBarnabas Health Business Development (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RWJBarnabas Health Business Development cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UPMC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UPMC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
RWJBarnabas Health Business Development

RWJBarnabas Health Business Development

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UPMC

UPMC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UPM1773786562
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UPMNOR1773678972
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
UPM2344101122

FAQ

Between RWJBarnabas Health Business Development company and UPMC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between RWJBarnabas Health Business Development company and UPMC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between RWJBarnabas Health Business Development company and UPMC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between RWJBarnabas Health Business Development company and UPMC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between RWJBarnabas Health Business Development company and UPMC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between RWJBarnabas Health Business Development company and UPMC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between RWJBarnabas Health Business Development company and UPMC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between RWJBarnabas Health Business Development company and UPMC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between RWJBarnabas Health Business Development company and UPMC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between RWJBarnabas Health Business Development company and UPMC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between RWJBarnabas Health Business Development company and UPMC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between RWJBarnabas Health Business Development and UPMC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between RWJBarnabas Health Business Development and UPMC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - RWJBarnabas Health Business Development or UPMC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - RWJBarnabas Health Business Development or UPMC ?
Between RWJBarnabas Health Business Development and UPMC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between RWJBarnabas Health Business Development and UPMC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA